I don't see what could possibly go wrong with people who don't have kids and so have more time on their hands being barred from voting, I mean it's not like they would get angry at the government for such a decision right ? Or use that extra time to do something about such a restriction......right ?
Sounds like a good way to build resentment, especially if you keep up with female biased courts and so on.
It's less about the incels and the voters and more about the leaders.
Everywhere you look in the West the "leaders" are nihilist non-child-rearing weirdoes.
They're the lefty aunt who doesn't wanna have kids because of global warming. They are the creepy commie uncle who never has long term relationships because women ask for children and he doesn't like that the reds lost.
If the leaders are morose sad-sacks who hit the thumbs-up emoji at the former Georgia guidestones, how can they defend anything?
Why think of children? They want depopulation.
Why protect tradition? They want a year zero.
Why defend a nation? They believe the very idea to be harmful.
So yeah, limiting voting is not how I'd do it. I'd ban misanthropic old people from running in the first place.
From my experience a lot of people that don't have kids or a spouse are those that are working to be able to handle such a commitment in as stable of an environment as possible.
These people are usually motivated and trying to build a better life for themselves and to have the government say they then can't vote would likely not have that much an impact.....until time after time they get shafted by the government (as is already the case) and this time they have the added resentment of their voice being muted by those in power.
This view of Elon's smells of rich person who has forgotten/never knew that a lot of people in society are smart enough to put thought into having children and not financially well off enough to be able to give them a decent life.
And all this before we take into account the other half of the problem, that you need 2 to tango and currently men must tango with their legs broken by all manner of unfair rules that will end your life should you pick a bad tango partner
Well I mean, its the only reason to exist. Failure to reproduce is a fundamental failure at life and no amount of wishing otherwise will change that. It is winning a Darwin award as a non-participation trophy. Your futile struggles against the facts of human reproduction make you an unfit dead end. It is what it is.
I don't see what could possibly go wrong with people who don't have kids and so have more time on their hands being barred from voting, I mean it's not like they would get angry at the government for such a decision right ? Or use that extra time to do something about such a restriction......right ?
Sounds like a good way to build resentment, especially if you keep up with female biased courts and so on.
It's less about the incels and the voters and more about the leaders. Everywhere you look in the West the "leaders" are nihilist non-child-rearing weirdoes.
They're the lefty aunt who doesn't wanna have kids because of global warming. They are the creepy commie uncle who never has long term relationships because women ask for children and he doesn't like that the reds lost.
If the leaders are morose sad-sacks who hit the thumbs-up emoji at the former Georgia guidestones, how can they defend anything?
Why think of children? They want depopulation.
Why protect tradition? They want a year zero.
Why defend a nation? They believe the very idea to be harmful.
So yeah, limiting voting is not how I'd do it. I'd ban misanthropic old people from running in the first place.
From my experience a lot of people that don't have kids or a spouse are those that are working to be able to handle such a commitment in as stable of an environment as possible.
These people are usually motivated and trying to build a better life for themselves and to have the government say they then can't vote would likely not have that much an impact.....until time after time they get shafted by the government (as is already the case) and this time they have the added resentment of their voice being muted by those in power.
This view of Elon's smells of rich person who has forgotten/never knew that a lot of people in society are smart enough to put thought into having children and not financially well off enough to be able to give them a decent life.
And all this before we take into account the other half of the problem, that you need 2 to tango and currently men must tango with their legs broken by all manner of unfair rules that will end your life should you pick a bad tango partner
They don't consider you human if you can't/don't want to be selected by a woman.
It's that simple. They will dress it up in claims that they're against childless women, but that's BS that nobody should fall for.
Well I mean, its the only reason to exist. Failure to reproduce is a fundamental failure at life and no amount of wishing otherwise will change that. It is winning a Darwin award as a non-participation trophy. Your futile struggles against the facts of human reproduction make you an unfit dead end. It is what it is.
I disagree. There are plenty of people who have kids who are still massive failures.
Women chase after ex-cons and more people in juvenile detention have had sex than MIT graduates.