The arabs can exploit the foreigners because they have strong in-group preference and strength is seen in a positive light. Yeeting work permit immigrants is just business as usual.
In the West however, implementing a program like that will open the gates because of empathy and pity and media focus. Journos will rearrange a child's corpse to get a better picture...you think they won't hunt for the most pathetic, pitiful "guest worker" to run several pieces on so that you can open the gates again?
The only sustainable solution is zero migration, repatriation, and incentives for young indigenous couples to have children (i.e. actual italians).
It's got nothing to do with 'empathy' and everything to do with interest.
'Empathy' is the moron's reason for supporting this sort of thing, just like Ukraine being 'free and democratic' is the dumb person's reason for supporting the NATO proxy war there.
Those in charge have neither empathy, nor do they believe in freedom or democracy (not even the fictional kind).
True, the European don't have the same callousness that the Arabs can have, even Roman slavery was more humane than Arab mass castration.
Europe is better doing a Japanese model of extremely tough immigration requirements with a North Korean border security while focusing more on in-house training of citizens with more focus on robotics and AI for automation.
Liberal priors are dead and dying. I don't care if it's discrimination, I don't care if it's not universal, I don't care if it prefers one group over another.
An italian policy doesn't have to account for all people, neither should an english policy, or a zimbabwean policy. No one embargoed Mugabe after he yeeted people just for deficient melanin, no one complained that it's not "fair" for everyone.
Take your universalist hot-takes back to the academy. Parochialism will return by vote or collapse.
What are you talking about? It's much simpler than that. Incentivising birth never works and breeds intense resentment in younger men who know they're being actively discriminated against.
SK tried to solve their gender war with huge payoffs for those who were willing to couple up. It failed. Their birth rate fell again that year.
All incentivising birth will do, is make "white trash" families more common. Only the poor and the naive/stupid have kids now. Nobody else is falling for the obvious siren song.
You are again falling for the "universalist" background of current lawmaking. If poor losers are the recipients of our proposed incentive, then we ban them.
"You can't do that!" Yes we can, worse laws have been passed for less.
"You'll be giving money to the middle class! They don't need it!" I don't care. If they are the ones best positioned to have children who'll succeed then they get the bag.
Consider some homeschooling laws in the States. You get a yearly stipend if you homeschool. Can the impoverished single mother take the cash and devote all the time to filling out forms for refunds for lessons, materials, etc.?
No, it's the married middle class woman, often religious, who has enough free time to plan the lessons, deal with the government program for refunds, etc.
"That's not fair for poor people!" I don't care. They get free surgery and I get boned for 200 dollars everytime I go for a yearly checkup despite losing 40% of my income to taxes. Sounds fair to me.
It's still a trojan horse.
The arabs can exploit the foreigners because they have strong in-group preference and strength is seen in a positive light. Yeeting work permit immigrants is just business as usual.
In the West however, implementing a program like that will open the gates because of empathy and pity and media focus. Journos will rearrange a child's corpse to get a better picture...you think they won't hunt for the most pathetic, pitiful "guest worker" to run several pieces on so that you can open the gates again?
The only sustainable solution is zero migration, repatriation, and incentives for young indigenous couples to have children (i.e. actual italians).
It's got nothing to do with 'empathy' and everything to do with interest.
'Empathy' is the moron's reason for supporting this sort of thing, just like Ukraine being 'free and democratic' is the dumb person's reason for supporting the NATO proxy war there.
Those in charge have neither empathy, nor do they believe in freedom or democracy (not even the fictional kind).
True, the European don't have the same callousness that the Arabs can have, even Roman slavery was more humane than Arab mass castration.
Europe is better doing a Japanese model of extremely tough immigration requirements with a North Korean border security while focusing more on in-house training of citizens with more focus on robotics and AI for automation.
Absolutely fucking not.
Liberal priors are dead and dying. I don't care if it's discrimination, I don't care if it's not universal, I don't care if it prefers one group over another.
An italian policy doesn't have to account for all people, neither should an english policy, or a zimbabwean policy. No one embargoed Mugabe after he yeeted people just for deficient melanin, no one complained that it's not "fair" for everyone.
Take your universalist hot-takes back to the academy. Parochialism will return by vote or collapse.
What are you talking about? It's much simpler than that. Incentivising birth never works and breeds intense resentment in younger men who know they're being actively discriminated against.
SK tried to solve their gender war with huge payoffs for those who were willing to couple up. It failed. Their birth rate fell again that year.
All incentivising birth will do, is make "white trash" families more common. Only the poor and the naive/stupid have kids now. Nobody else is falling for the obvious siren song.
You are again falling for the "universalist" background of current lawmaking. If poor losers are the recipients of our proposed incentive, then we ban them.
"You can't do that!" Yes we can, worse laws have been passed for less.
"You'll be giving money to the middle class! They don't need it!" I don't care. If they are the ones best positioned to have children who'll succeed then they get the bag.
Consider some homeschooling laws in the States. You get a yearly stipend if you homeschool. Can the impoverished single mother take the cash and devote all the time to filling out forms for refunds for lessons, materials, etc.?
No, it's the married middle class woman, often religious, who has enough free time to plan the lessons, deal with the government program for refunds, etc.
"That's not fair for poor people!" I don't care. They get free surgery and I get boned for 200 dollars everytime I go for a yearly checkup despite losing 40% of my income to taxes. Sounds fair to me.