Liberal priors are dead and dying. I don't care if it's discrimination, I don't care if it's not universal, I don't care if it prefers one group over another.
An italian policy doesn't have to account for all people, neither should an english policy, or a zimbabwean policy. No one embargoed Mugabe after he yeeted people just for deficient melanin, no one complained that it's not "fair" for everyone.
Take your universalist hot-takes back to the academy. Parochialism will return by vote or collapse.
What are you talking about? It's much simpler than that. Incentivising birth never works and breeds intense resentment in younger men who know they're being actively discriminated against.
SK tried to solve their gender war with huge payoffs for those who were willing to couple up. It failed. Their birth rate fell again that year.
All incentivising birth will do, is make "white trash" families more common. Only the poor and the naive/stupid have kids now. Nobody else is falling for the obvious siren song.
You are again falling for the "universalist" background of current lawmaking. If poor losers are the recipients of our proposed incentive, then we ban them.
"You can't do that!" Yes we can, worse laws have been passed for less.
"You'll be giving money to the middle class! They don't need it!" I don't care. If they are the ones best positioned to have children who'll succeed then they get the bag.
Consider some homeschooling laws in the States. You get a yearly stipend if you homeschool. Can the impoverished single mother take the cash and devote all the time to filling out forms for refunds for lessons, materials, etc.?
No, it's the married middle class woman, often religious, who has enough free time to plan the lessons, deal with the government program for refunds, etc.
"That's not fair for poor people!" I don't care. They get free surgery and I get boned for 200 dollars everytime I go for a yearly checkup despite losing 40% of my income to taxes. Sounds fair to me.
Liberal priors are dead and dying. I don't care if it's discrimination, I don't care if it's not universal, I don't care if it prefers one group over another.
An italian policy doesn't have to account for all people, neither should an english policy, or a zimbabwean policy. No one embargoed Mugabe after he yeeted people just for deficient melanin, no one complained that it's not "fair" for everyone.
Take your universalist hot-takes back to the academy. Parochialism will return by vote or collapse.
What are you talking about? It's much simpler than that. Incentivising birth never works and breeds intense resentment in younger men who know they're being actively discriminated against.
SK tried to solve their gender war with huge payoffs for those who were willing to couple up. It failed. Their birth rate fell again that year.
All incentivising birth will do, is make "white trash" families more common. Only the poor and the naive/stupid have kids now. Nobody else is falling for the obvious siren song.
You are again falling for the "universalist" background of current lawmaking. If poor losers are the recipients of our proposed incentive, then we ban them.
"You can't do that!" Yes we can, worse laws have been passed for less.
"You'll be giving money to the middle class! They don't need it!" I don't care. If they are the ones best positioned to have children who'll succeed then they get the bag.
Consider some homeschooling laws in the States. You get a yearly stipend if you homeschool. Can the impoverished single mother take the cash and devote all the time to filling out forms for refunds for lessons, materials, etc.?
No, it's the married middle class woman, often religious, who has enough free time to plan the lessons, deal with the government program for refunds, etc.
"That's not fair for poor people!" I don't care. They get free surgery and I get boned for 200 dollars everytime I go for a yearly checkup despite losing 40% of my income to taxes. Sounds fair to me.
You'd have to give away an insane amount to :
A : Make a man willing to take the risk of being fucked with 18 years of child support.
B : Make a woman willing to forgo employment without the ability to fuck the man over to gain back her losses and more.