We haven't seen anything close to actual vigilantism, we've only seen people defending themselves. They attack because they know they aren't actually vigilantes, just normal people with homes and jobs and families and things to lose. If actual death wish style vigilantism takes hold, they'll be too afraid to do anything.
When both people are injured it is a mutual combat situation. In mutual combat with a criminal as an employee of the store you should always be in the right.
This is not a vigilante this is a guy defending himself from a known criminal threat.
I’m sure liberals will say that we can’t allow vigilantism. But I ask: what is vigilantism in a society that endorses lawlessness?
We haven't seen anything close to actual vigilantism, we've only seen people defending themselves. They attack because they know they aren't actually vigilantes, just normal people with homes and jobs and families and things to lose. If actual death wish style vigilantism takes hold, they'll be too afraid to do anything.
When both people are injured it is a mutual combat situation. In mutual combat with a criminal as an employee of the store you should always be in the right.
This is not a vigilante this is a guy defending himself from a known criminal threat.
I say that the store employee should just identify as Black. As we all know from the last few years, knife fighting is just a part of their culture.
Depends on the construction, plenty have heavy contouring to prevent that from happening.
Rebellion.