It's on twitter which I can't link to because Musk is being a gay bitch right now but her tweet literally is just "the Constitution was written by slave owners," that's it, there's no attached commentary. It's a bad faith argument masquerading as a trivia fact, as though slavery is so bad that everything the Founders did needs to be discarded because they owned slaves.
She's a retarded nigger and the only reason she's an American and not a rape-slave in Uganda is because her great-great-great-great-grandparents were sold into slavery in the first place. The Constitution is more important and more significant than anything produced by any other race, slave-owning or no. It's possibly our species' crowning achievement (until we colonize exo-planets).
Also dont tell them that most of the Founding Fathers were against it and did what they could to try and overturn it. Or that Jefferson pretty much set up "All Men are created equal" with the knowledge that it conflicted with Slavery and thus the argument would eventually have to be settled.
But no. We must destroy Jefferson and Washington because they kept their slaves. Please ignore that Virginia had a law that made it virtually impossible to free your slaves even if you wanted to, and both engaged in legal shenanigans in their wills to sidestep it as much as possible (like Washington "gifting" his slaves to relatives in states that just so happened to not have such "eternal slave" laws).
Well said sir. Didn’t Washington free his slaves upon his death? Also Washington’s former slaves took care of his grave for the rest of their lives. Clearly he must have shown them some compassion. Also he said he wanted to see an eventual abolition
Not all of them, but as many as he could. Same with Jefferson.
And I remember reading that Jefferson originally put lines in the Declaration of Independence vehemently opposing slavery but had to take those out. People today don’t realize that they debated fiercely over slavery during the founding and the 3/5 thing was a compromise
They're so ignorant that they take the exact opposite position on the 3/5 clause. They say "I WAS ONLY CONSIDERED 3/5 OF A PERSON". First of all, you're no slave (except to your appetites and emotions), so no. Secondly, you make it sound like you'd be happy if slaves were counted as 1/1 of a person... which was the slaveholders' position cause they wanted more representation.