https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1665141061650378755
Easily the most talked about and widely viewed documentary film of the past several years is just an “anti-transgender video” according to NBC. Of course they won’t even attempt to try and debunk or engage with any of the content in the film. They know they can’t.
Musk’s response to an anti-trans video sparks 24 hours of chaos at Twitter https://archive.is/wip/PYmPK
https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1664698582769827840
CNN news anchor calls #WhatIsAWoman an "anti-trans documentary" that could be "potentially harmful content."
It's not a documentary when it's not even the truth.
Radical feminists advocated castration before Dr Money was even born. "A Sex Revolution" was published in 1893.
What are we supposed to get from that book? I couldn't find much info about it.
It's not that interesting. It's just the oldest book I've seen excerpts of that talks about mass castration and male genocide.
My point is that castrating little boys has always been a feminist agenda.
Where did you even find out about the book's contents? I didn't find much of anything besides links to buy it.
Castration != trans shit. Eunuchs go back to ancient Sumeria or some shit, like 4000 years ago, and that's just what we know.
You're getting at it but you got it backwards, it is the same thing, just a different name.
Reopened under new management.
Corporate rebranding.
Lol calling it eunuchs is dead-naming trans ideology.
I had to go through many loopholes, and use a VPN set to a European country for some reason, as well as create a throwaway email. It's not worth the effort.
It's not much different from the SCUM Manifesto in terms of content, just more violent. While Solanas talks about locking us all in glorified gas chambers, this one is all about killing us with force. I think it says something about allowing castrated men to fight alongside the women, but I could be confusing it with the SCUM Auxiliary, or some of the other manifestos I've read, like The Future - if there is one - Is Female.
I disagree. I think there's some correlation there, just with a spin to make it more palatable to the general public.
“A sex revolution” by Lois Waisbrooker
https://www.thecommoner.org.uk/sex-politics-and-anarchism-american-jewish-anarchist-women-1920-1950/
🤔
Even back in the 1800s huh?
I'm not sure what your point is here. I skimmed the article, it doesn't say she is Jewish.
Also, that's a communist site, you idiot.
Finally, I can only speak confidently of what I have record of. I'm sure there are many, many others that I haven't read.
No one seems to care about this obscure dumb bitch besides you and random anarcho communists.
I have a fair level of interest in obscure feminist literature.
Know your enemy and all that.
Read the article title then read the early life section of all the women listed in the article
I did, commies lie.
Next line is going to be "Wikipedia removes people being Jewish".
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_Waisbrooker