Because I don't need to, everyone sane knows that this story is suspicious. That's why feminist women protested to make her freedom happen, it's their new framework for killing us.
Take out the organized crime gangs who kill each other and mentally ill single-mother abuse victims and let's see if it still looks so favorable to the worse half of society.
How hard is it to kill someone who is stronger than you and fighting you, with a t-shirt? Her story is full of obvious lies like that. It's not fucking possible. It's something straight out of Hollywood feminist murder porn.
because they are not men
Because they are irrelevant to the safety of a normal person.
Because they know it'll be overturned from public pressure.
I swear, you do not know anything about how feminists operate. The most important thing in that trial was to get a rape verdict on the board for her. Then they could move away from the evidence based court system that would likely jail her for murder and throw out her ridiculous rape story, towards public, violent protests in her name to force the government to back down.
Take a loss to get a win later on. It's why they are siding with the trads to get rid of their castration cult. Because they need to get rid of it before the true believers define women out of legal existence.
It's generally easier to make predictions when your side controls the narrative.
She didn't act in self defense. Her story is full of holes and improbable events that strongly suggest he was invited over specifically for her to murder him for fun.
I think she should be jailed for life to send a message to the rest of them about claiming "self defense" when you know you murdered in cold blood. It shows contempt for the victim, for the legal system and for humanity in general.
Then people wonder why Mexican men are trying to get over the border. South America is a feminist hellhole and even their right wing parties (maybe not Bolsonaro) are complicit. They think the US is better, but we're all in the same fucking boat that women shot to pieces out of pure spite.
It's generally easier to make predictions when your side controls the narrative.
Well, you can't even get established facts right, let alone anything that you have to predict. Remember how the 'bachelor tax' caused the fall of Rome?
Her story is full of holes and improbable events that strongly suggest he was invited over specifically for her to murder him for fun.
I'm sure 23-year-old women invite strange men over to the apartment where their little son lives specifically in order to murder them for fun.
I think she should be jailed for life to send a message to the rest of them about claiming "self defense" when you know you murdered in cold blood. It shows contempt for the victim, for the legal system and for humanity in general.
LOL! Even feminists have more sanity than you do.
Then people wonder why Mexican men are trying to get over the border.
You honestly should be a stand-up comedian.
we're all in the same fucking boat that women shot to pieces out of pure spite.
Find yourself a girl who looks at you the way the Imp looks at rapists, grooming gang members and murderers of women.
The story is shady as fuck, she somehow strangled a rapist to death with a tshirt…
Probably while he was sleeping, then slipped his dick inside her after killing him to give the "evidence" that she was raped. Only way that works.
At this point, it's almost impossible that you are not a troll.
I'm not sure why you think that's above them.
Did you read her "ordeal" or are you just being a simp?
This is women doing what they do best. Murdering someone and slandering their name to get away with it. See also : Coercive Control.
Why don't you show me and prove that you're not the rapist-lover everyone knows you to be?
Who had higher rates of murder again?
Because I don't need to, everyone sane knows that this story is suspicious. That's why feminist women protested to make her freedom happen, it's their new framework for killing us.
Take out the organized crime gangs who kill each other and mentally ill single-mother abuse victims and let's see if it still looks so favorable to the worse half of society.
Ah, as usual, you have no evidence.
Does that include people who claim that the vaccine had a 90% death rate and that Kim Potter would not be indicted?
Here's how I avoid that framework.
I don't rape women.
Hard, I know.
Because they are not men?
How hard is it to kill someone who is stronger than you and fighting you, with a t-shirt? Her story is full of obvious lies like that. It's not fucking possible. It's something straight out of Hollywood feminist murder porn.
Because they are irrelevant to the safety of a normal person.
If something is hard, it means it didn't happen.
Because the south side of Chicago is safe for a normal person?
You're an imbecile.
Besides, we're talking about who commits more murders, not who is most relevant to the safety of a normal person.
Not only did she murder a man in cold blood, she slandered his legacy and his good name to get away with it.
Scum.
You're a piece of shit.
A court also agreed E Jean Carroll was sexually assaulted. Juries can be filled with women/their sympathizers.
OK, so the court was filled with "women/their sympathizers" and yet sentenced a woman to 6 years for defending herself against her rapist.
You are laughably stupid.
Because they know it'll be overturned from public pressure.
I swear, you do not know anything about how feminists operate. The most important thing in that trial was to get a rape verdict on the board for her. Then they could move away from the evidence based court system that would likely jail her for murder and throw out her ridiculous rape story, towards public, violent protests in her name to force the government to back down.
Take a loss to get a win later on. It's why they are siding with the trads to get rid of their castration cult. Because they need to get rid of it before the true believers define women out of legal existence.
I guess their predictive powers were better than yours, given your predictions which have been numerous and uniformly incorrect.
If the court had any sense, it would have found that she acted in self-defense, and that it should not even have been brought to trial.
You think she should be jailed because she is a woman.
It's generally easier to make predictions when your side controls the narrative.
She didn't act in self defense. Her story is full of holes and improbable events that strongly suggest he was invited over specifically for her to murder him for fun.
I think she should be jailed for life to send a message to the rest of them about claiming "self defense" when you know you murdered in cold blood. It shows contempt for the victim, for the legal system and for humanity in general.
Then people wonder why Mexican men are trying to get over the border. South America is a feminist hellhole and even their right wing parties (maybe not Bolsonaro) are complicit. They think the US is better, but we're all in the same fucking boat that women shot to pieces out of pure spite.
Well, you can't even get established facts right, let alone anything that you have to predict. Remember how the 'bachelor tax' caused the fall of Rome?
I'm sure 23-year-old women invite strange men over to the apartment where their little son lives specifically in order to murder them for fun.
LOL! Even feminists have more sanity than you do.
You honestly should be a stand-up comedian.
Heart damage.
Oooookay, 100% do not believe her, now.
My guess is she didn't want it dine. The only thing they can tell is if 2 people put their privates together.
If she killed him, or someone else killed him and she's covering, she simoky refuses because they actually had sex.
Police need to stop assuming women's obvious lies will be found out.
The extra money and time is worth it to keep psychos like this off the streets.