Because they know it'll be overturned from public pressure.
I swear, you do not know anything about how feminists operate. The most important thing in that trial was to get a rape verdict on the board for her. Then they could move away from the evidence based court system that would likely jail her for murder and throw out her ridiculous rape story, towards public, violent protests in her name to force the government to back down.
Take a loss to get a win later on. It's why they are siding with the trads to get rid of their castration cult. Because they need to get rid of it before the true believers define women out of legal existence.
You're a piece of shit.
A court also agreed E Jean Carroll was sexually assaulted. Juries can be filled with women/their sympathizers.
OK, so the court was filled with "women/their sympathizers" and yet sentenced a woman to 6 years for defending herself against her rapist.
You are laughably stupid.
Because they know it'll be overturned from public pressure.
I swear, you do not know anything about how feminists operate. The most important thing in that trial was to get a rape verdict on the board for her. Then they could move away from the evidence based court system that would likely jail her for murder and throw out her ridiculous rape story, towards public, violent protests in her name to force the government to back down.
Take a loss to get a win later on. It's why they are siding with the trads to get rid of their castration cult. Because they need to get rid of it before the true believers define women out of legal existence.
I guess their predictive powers were better than yours, given your predictions which have been numerous and uniformly incorrect.
If the court had any sense, it would have found that she acted in self-defense, and that it should not even have been brought to trial.
You think she should be jailed because she is a woman.