"Pride events" in Japan are full of American flags
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
It would not be completely crazy to defend homosexuals per se. But to downplay the damage of activism just so you can blame someone else for everything going wrong is quite another thing.
Didn't say it was. It's the enthusiasm and general illogical kneejerkerism that makes me raise an eyebrow.
Gays get blamed for raping children or something? "Here's why it's actually women's fault!" No, just no. If/when gays do bad things (and same for trannies, Jews, blacks, etc.), it's insane to pivot from that to "but whamen." That's what I'm calling out. Anyone can defend anyone else they want, and sometimes it is warranted, but Imp very specifically defends these "communities" that do seem to actively be working against our best interests, simply because they aren't women...or something.
He picks fights with anyone who says bad things about Jews, he vigorously defends trannies, he says gays/drags/trannies don't sexually abuse anyone at higher rates, and he claims there is no such thing as anti-white racism. Then goes on at length about women, even in contexts where it makes no sense. I've defended Imp from the very start, and found him entertaining, but it's getting very old at this point. And I think he's getting worse, and making even less sense.
Same reason he defends Jews: not out of any love for the group, but because he thinks that it distracts from the True Enemy.
Yeah, he's becoming less entertaining. I loved it when he called the war in Ukraine the "women's war" and claimed that Lithuania started the war. How can you even make up such gems?
Yup, that's generally my take as well. Although I do think he loves trannies, because he views male trannies as invading and hurting women, and female trannies as women hurting themselves. I personally completely disavow such societal rot and evil just to get one over on the True Enemy. Even if it worked, it's not worth it. It hurts itself in its confusion.
Also, I think his '(anti-white) racism isn't real' take is stupid, even compared to his others, since it's generally not even naming an enemy. Even the idea that there are other victims than men, or other problems than women - much less other culprits - is too much for him. There are no problems, except those directly caused by Women. There are no victimizers, except Women. There are no victims, except Men.
And it's getting extremely tiresome.
I think he tries to portray male trannies as victims, and that this overrides his glee at them hurting women.
Don't underestimate how widespread the idea that "anti-white racism isn't real" is, although he does not have the excuse of being brainwashed by the media. That is actually one of the less idiotic beliefs of average people, because someone who is foolish enough to believe the media will think that the media does not report on it because it does not happen.