If you think teachers do anything more than churn out lessons based off textbooks, you're retarded
I do, because I actually went to school in the US and saw it happen many times. Including my own sex ed class. I feel like my actual experience trumps your wild hate.
Nobody's going to care about boys being sexualized.
I do, that's why I have an issue with it. Unlike you, who doesn't care about helping anyone if it means women might also benefit or be involved.
Come on, you've seen the sheer volume of absolute trash that goes into teaching now.
Irrelevant and a complete goal post move. Teaching curriculum has way more than just direct textbook transcribing, even if its still trash by a lazy or politically motivated idiot.
Why on earth would you benefit your enemy?
Because everything that could help men, will help women in some form. Even if they don't like it. I won't condemn men to suffering and misery just to make sure women also are.
And that's operating on your wild assumption that not wanting boys to be called "people who produce sperm" is part of whatever you consider the "war on women" in your head. Which I don't agree with.
You seem to confuse what women say with what women truly want/need. A common problem from guys who don't interact with them at all.
Taking away their freedoms and responsibilities will benefit them and in fact make thier lives better across the board. Because all your ideas will do is remove most of them from the workplace and instead rely on men as housewives again.
And I know you hate the very idea of that too, but as I've said before, unless you are prepared to genocide them down to fraction of the population (which will lead to our extinction) its the only other option available. We all know you are too much of a coward to admit to wanting that, and will instead twist into a dozen knots about how you totally know how to avoid it.
I do, because I actually went to school in the US and saw it happen many times. Including my own sex ed class. I feel like my actual experience trumps your wild hate.
I do, that's why I have an issue with it. Unlike you, who doesn't care about helping anyone if it means women might also benefit or be involved.
Irrelevant and a complete goal post move. Teaching curriculum has way more than just direct textbook transcribing, even if its still trash by a lazy or politically motivated idiot.
Because everything that could help men, will help women in some form. Even if they don't like it. I won't condemn men to suffering and misery just to make sure women also are.
And that's operating on your wild assumption that not wanting boys to be called "people who produce sperm" is part of whatever you consider the "war on women" in your head. Which I don't agree with.
You seem to confuse what women say with what women truly want/need. A common problem from guys who don't interact with them at all.
Taking away their freedoms and responsibilities will benefit them and in fact make thier lives better across the board. Because all your ideas will do is remove most of them from the workplace and instead rely on men as housewives again.
And I know you hate the very idea of that too, but as I've said before, unless you are prepared to genocide them down to fraction of the population (which will lead to our extinction) its the only other option available. We all know you are too much of a coward to admit to wanting that, and will instead twist into a dozen knots about how you totally know how to avoid it.