I've taken to calling them "tradcucks." They overshot the mark in opposing Leftist sexual degeneracy and slid all the way over into the puritan scale. Then they go looking for justifications to support their "new worldview" and cue the bullshit Internet arguments.
The worst part is that they're being played by (((voices in the middle))). Loli art is sort of a canary in the coal mine for both private lewdness and Internet free expression in general. Trannies HATE it, and have been trying to drive this wedge for a few years now, because its a massive fault line between the recently ascendant "gamer/anime Right" and the normalfag Right and middle. Meanwhile the tradcucks see it as low hanging fruit to bitch about, so they're happy to help the gender communists hammer the wedge in if it means they get clout with the evangelical soccer mom types. Its tiresome and I wish that every person who falls for it to get hit by ball lightning.
it's creepy how many replies I'm getting from people ITT trying to defend lolicons.
I'm not trying to 'defend lolicons', I'm trying to defend reality. You have an opinion that I am 100% certain is simply at odds with the objective reality of the situation. I vociferously attack all objectively wrong opinions regardless of what side of current politics they appear on, because I prize objectivity.
How the fuck would you know? Are you a lolicon? Do you have lots of lolicon friends?
I know because I am an erotic artist. I don't produce lolicon - far from it - but I do draw things things that don't really resemble anything real. I draw them in a way that is beyond reality, and I venture into finding shapes that makes people's brains light up. I am essentially producing visual patterns that don't exist in nature, and short-circuit brains that have evolved in nature. I'm hacking the brain.
It is to be completely expected, then, that the images I produce will generate feelings of attraction where a real life approximation of the subject would not. One such case is fat women. You can draw fat women so beautiful - it's easy. The brain loves big, bouncy round shapes. She can have flawless skin, her rolls (if there are any) can be golden ratio'd in their distribution, she can have a skinny neck an firm under-arms, her facial structure need not be buried under blubber, her ankles need not be cankles, her thighs can be massive and yet not deform or overhang her knees. I can draw a 450lb blob and make her look good. Reality can't do that.
I saw a nude photograph of Lizzo this week, and she looked repulsive. I could draw a cartoon of her and make her beautiful, but guess what? It wouldn't be her no matter how much I said it was, and any boner generated by it would be unlikely to equate to a boner for the flesh and blood bridge troll that is Lizzo.
You've described something in great detail that I've struggled for a long time to convey. Bravo. People need to stop virtue signaling over drawings and focus on shit that causes actual harm.
It's a tough subject to understand unless you start learning to draw it yourself, or least start analyzing what features make stylized characters 'attractive' or 'unattractive'. But just purely analyzing, you will run into your own biases. Only by sincerely trying to draw stylized characters that crowds of people find attractive yourself will you really learn the myriad ways you can utterly fail, and only then will you begin to get sense of what's really going on.
Most people would find it close to impossible to put into words any explanation of why one stylized character design tickle's people pickles and another does not.
Your argument just got systematically torn limb from limb and that is your response? Someone is acting like a redditor here and it isnt the dude you're replying to.
So now your argument is that the dudes who masturbate to anime kids are the true heroes, while the people who are opposed to sexual depictions of anime kids are the true pedos?
LOL.
Why are there so many fucking pedophiles in this thread. Where did you motherfuckers come from?
They aren't "heroes" , when did i say that, ? i simply stated that there have been cases of them getting actual pedos arrested when they searched the backgrounds of some anti loli crusaders who turned out to be pedos.
No, you do. Honestly it's creepy how many replies I'm getting from people ITT trying to defend lolicons.
How the fuck would you know? Are you a lolicon? Do you have lots of lolicon friends?
i know some lolicons have gotten actual pedos arrested when they searched the backgrounds of some antis that they turned out to be actual pedos.
So the people who jerk off to depictions of child pornography are actually heroes. Got it.
The lolicon cope is honestly embarrassing.
"So, what you're saying is..."
You fucking midwits are no better than the people you criticize.
I've taken to calling them "tradcucks." They overshot the mark in opposing Leftist sexual degeneracy and slid all the way over into the puritan scale. Then they go looking for justifications to support their "new worldview" and cue the bullshit Internet arguments.
The worst part is that they're being played by (((voices in the middle))). Loli art is sort of a canary in the coal mine for both private lewdness and Internet free expression in general. Trannies HATE it, and have been trying to drive this wedge for a few years now, because its a massive fault line between the recently ascendant "gamer/anime Right" and the normalfag Right and middle. Meanwhile the tradcucks see it as low hanging fruit to bitch about, so they're happy to help the gender communists hammer the wedge in if it means they get clout with the evangelical soccer mom types. Its tiresome and I wish that every person who falls for it to get hit by ball lightning.
Fucking five star assessment right here.
I'm not trying to 'defend lolicons', I'm trying to defend reality. You have an opinion that I am 100% certain is simply at odds with the objective reality of the situation. I vociferously attack all objectively wrong opinions regardless of what side of current politics they appear on, because I prize objectivity.
I know because I am an erotic artist. I don't produce lolicon - far from it - but I do draw things things that don't really resemble anything real. I draw them in a way that is beyond reality, and I venture into finding shapes that makes people's brains light up. I am essentially producing visual patterns that don't exist in nature, and short-circuit brains that have evolved in nature. I'm hacking the brain.
It is to be completely expected, then, that the images I produce will generate feelings of attraction where a real life approximation of the subject would not. One such case is fat women. You can draw fat women so beautiful - it's easy. The brain loves big, bouncy round shapes. She can have flawless skin, her rolls (if there are any) can be golden ratio'd in their distribution, she can have a skinny neck an firm under-arms, her facial structure need not be buried under blubber, her ankles need not be cankles, her thighs can be massive and yet not deform or overhang her knees. I can draw a 450lb blob and make her look good. Reality can't do that.
I saw a nude photograph of Lizzo this week, and she looked repulsive. I could draw a cartoon of her and make her beautiful, but guess what? It wouldn't be her no matter how much I said it was, and any boner generated by it would be unlikely to equate to a boner for the flesh and blood bridge troll that is Lizzo.
You've described something in great detail that I've struggled for a long time to convey. Bravo. People need to stop virtue signaling over drawings and focus on shit that causes actual harm.
It's a tough subject to understand unless you start learning to draw it yourself, or least start analyzing what features make stylized characters 'attractive' or 'unattractive'. But just purely analyzing, you will run into your own biases. Only by sincerely trying to draw stylized characters that crowds of people find attractive yourself will you really learn the myriad ways you can utterly fail, and only then will you begin to get sense of what's really going on.
Most people would find it close to impossible to put into words any explanation of why one stylized character design tickle's people pickles and another does not.
Indistinguishable from Reddit lol
Your argument just got systematically torn limb from limb and that is your response? Someone is acting like a redditor here and it isnt the dude you're replying to.
I've turned a fun hobby into a source of income. Oh my, so irrational!
So now your argument is that the dudes who masturbate to anime kids are the true heroes, while the people who are opposed to sexual depictions of anime kids are the true pedos?
LOL.
Why are there so many fucking pedophiles in this thread. Where did you motherfuckers come from?
They aren't "heroes" , when did i say that, ? i simply stated that there have been cases of them getting actual pedos arrested when they searched the backgrounds of some anti loli crusaders who turned out to be pedos.
They literally always do this. It’s the same logic as “you don’t like gay shit, you must secretly want to fuck dudes”.
Fr, I'm convinced this site is being subverted.
No, free speech was part of it's core identity from the start. This is part of that. The righty puritans came later.
But the pedophile lefties just recently arrived