Lolicon isn't about kids it's about body type. Don't get me wrong, there's a LOT of stuff where it's clearly kids but it's focused on Asian attraction of youth so it's how you get the '900 year old vampire loli' archetype. They have the youthful look but the maturity of your average milf, you want examples look up Rory Mercury from GATE or Yue from Arifureta.
In regards to his tweets some of them not including the loli stuff is a product of their time. It was made in the era when we were WAY more edgy and this was popular song. Unless we want to fall in to the trap of removing cultural context while critiquing history, it's also a none starter.
The tweets with any regarding his kids and very disturbing comments are fair game even if we were back in the Filthy Frank era as 1. It uses a real kid 2. Uses a person they are in close proximity too. That's just disturbing.
Also ask dev from SFO about these trannies and lolicon, they tried to cancel him and claim he was a pedo because he liked anime and said lolicon was a non issue. They ironically stopped when they started praising Chris and Dev pointed out that he liked lolicon.
Its almost like people forget that loli was part of otaku culture for decades and nobody gave a shit at all about it last time if you said you like loli. it was only recently that people starting crying about it. Which has also accelerated to even calling things like Uzuki chan "pedo bait"
i stopped taking them seriously when i saw there was more people whining about anime than there was people talking about actual kids doing sexualized dances on tiktok.i've seen tweets that whine about lolis get more likes than tweets that talk about actual problems
Can you name anyone in “this crowd” that considered Cuties artistic and acceptable? The college student if it’s the one I’m thinking of was due to a clear physiognomy that left her face structurally looking like a prepubescent girl which would be clearly disturbing for some to think about sexually, especially those with children. Oh, and Loli is indeed creepy pedo shit. Kinda why self proclaimed pedos are the main consumers of Loli.
If you mean twitter freaks, yeah a lot of them did defend cuties using the fact 'their parents consented to them being in the film' as an excuse while they later go with the argument that lolicon is bad as 'a drawing can't consent'
It's either full retardation or utterly devoid of morality to argue that.
She is literally depicted as an adult. Stop obfuscating using idiots calling non loli, loli as an example of why loli is okay. It is plainly disingenuous
Lolicon isn't about kids it's about body type. Don't get me wrong, there's a LOT of stuff where it's clearly kids but it's focused on Asian attraction of youth so it's how you get the '900 year old vampire loli' archetype. They have the youthful look but the maturity of your average milf, you want examples look up Rory Mercury from GATE or Yue from Arifureta.
In regards to his tweets some of them not including the loli stuff is a product of their time. It was made in the era when we were WAY more edgy and this was popular song. Unless we want to fall in to the trap of removing cultural context while critiquing history, it's also a none starter.
The tweets with any regarding his kids and very disturbing comments are fair game even if we were back in the Filthy Frank era as 1. It uses a real kid 2. Uses a person they are in close proximity too. That's just disturbing.
Also ask dev from SFO about these trannies and lolicon, they tried to cancel him and claim he was a pedo because he liked anime and said lolicon was a non issue. They ironically stopped when they started praising Chris and Dev pointed out that he liked lolicon.
Its almost like people forget that loli was part of otaku culture for decades and nobody gave a shit at all about it last time if you said you like loli. it was only recently that people starting crying about it. Which has also accelerated to even calling things like Uzuki chan "pedo bait"
The fact that a short but with HUGE tits college student is considered 'pedo bait' by this crowd yet Cuties is artistic tells the entire story.
i stopped taking them seriously when i saw there was more people whining about anime than there was people talking about actual kids doing sexualized dances on tiktok.i've seen tweets that whine about lolis get more likes than tweets that talk about actual problems
Can you name anyone in “this crowd” that considered Cuties artistic and acceptable? The college student if it’s the one I’m thinking of was due to a clear physiognomy that left her face structurally looking like a prepubescent girl which would be clearly disturbing for some to think about sexually, especially those with children. Oh, and Loli is indeed creepy pedo shit. Kinda why self proclaimed pedos are the main consumers of Loli.
If you mean twitter freaks, yeah a lot of them did defend cuties using the fact 'their parents consented to them being in the film' as an excuse while they later go with the argument that lolicon is bad as 'a drawing can't consent'
It's either full retardation or utterly devoid of morality to argue that.
She is literally depicted as an adult. Stop obfuscating using idiots calling non loli, loli as an example of why loli is okay. It is plainly disingenuous