Plus as a comic book collector I saw this coming. America Chavez comics and ironheart comics are collecting dust. So many people I know just but old stuff now
Kathleen was a clear scapegoat since the days of TLJ being fresh, and that was obvious. She was a perfect lightning rod for all the video essayists and clickbait hate channels to focus on constantly, which kept heat off Iger and basically everyone else at Disney.
I didn't say she was blameless. Only that she wasn't the single mastermind core of this whole problem, it was an entire web of many fingers in that cookie jar.
Kennedy was chosen by Iger specifically because she was going to do things like that.
It is a common tactic of leadership to pick suboordinates who will do what you want them to without explicit instructions; for leftists, this means hiring other leftists, while for someone not corrupt, it means picking someone who understands the role and has aligned goals.
It does pose an important question: Are kid novelty companies pushing so many toys towards girls or “girls in training” (LGBTQ) a sign that boys simply want noting to do with consumerism as much as girls (and those who groomed to be girl like)?
Ah, the power of having an MBA.
The only things MBAs seem to do is make people spout buzzwords and be able to convince others of insanity
Plus as a comic book collector I saw this coming. America Chavez comics and ironheart comics are collecting dust. So many people I know just but old stuff now
Kathleen was a clear scapegoat since the days of TLJ being fresh, and that was obvious. She was a perfect lightning rod for all the video essayists and clickbait hate channels to focus on constantly, which kept heat off Iger and basically everyone else at Disney.
Kathleen deserves plenty of blame too. Nobody forced her to chant "the force is female" at us.
I didn't say she was blameless. Only that she wasn't the single mastermind core of this whole problem, it was an entire web of many fingers in that cookie jar.
Kennedy was chosen by Iger specifically because she was going to do things like that.
It is a common tactic of leadership to pick suboordinates who will do what you want them to without explicit instructions; for leftists, this means hiring other leftists, while for someone not corrupt, it means picking someone who understands the role and has aligned goals.
It does pose an important question: Are kid novelty companies pushing so many toys towards girls or “girls in training” (LGBTQ) a sign that boys simply want noting to do with consumerism as much as girls (and those who groomed to be girl like)?