Pfizer Confirms Via FOIA Graphene Oxide in the Clot Shots
(en-volve.com)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Was the wrong question, "is there graphene oxide in the shots?" If so, it sounds to me like people weren't asking the wrong question then... since there is graphene oxide in the shots.
I suppose the excuse for lying would be "it isn't an ingredient for the vex. That's how I interpreted the question. It isn't supposed to be there. And we didn't check for it because we--" *mic cuts out*
*doctor suddenly gets dropped into secret lava pit*
Bad faith aka hostile witness. The moment you discover that a person is treating you this way, you should immediately switch gears and use every resource at your disposal to utterly destroy them.
7 years later Pfizer: "We now know that the shots may have caused illness and death."
Said the statement from the Pfizer CEO from his private island in the Caribbean. Then it will only be 68 more years until we get all the documents and know for sure!
This is absolute bullshit. The document in question refers to a protocol to perform electron microscopy on a sample of the purified spike protein (expressed according to the sequence in these injections). It is NOT the protocol to manufacture these injections. Seriously, people should learn how to read and interpret the information they are reading, rather than jumping to stupid conclusions because they are too dumb or lazy or understand what they are reading.
Why wouldn't Pfizer just publicly share this instead of denying its use if it is so innocuous?
There's plenty of information in those documents that's not "innocuous", such as the damning information about the LNP distribution following injection in animal models, but this electron microscopy protocol is red herring. In my opinion, the whole graphene oxide "conspiracy" is a fake story spread to discredit those opposed to these injections.
They better retract these papers then:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/
Oh! You found references to graphene oxide as a potential ingredient in vaccines in the scientific literature! Therefore, obviously all vaccines must have graphene oxide in them! What a stupid argument. It's a red herring.
The expression of the spike protein is toxic enough by itself (and maybe the LNPs themselves), without needing to invoke some other toxic components, yet alone the ludicrous graphene oxide "nanobot" hypothesis (as if humans have technology that advanced).
https://phys.org/news/2021-07-tiny-sensors-brain-surgery-implants.html
This is based on silicon oxide but a working model of such a technology definitely exists.
Not sure why you're mad, I was poking fun at the fact that GO may actually be a better adjuvant. Are you saying that this isn't the case?
Some researchers over-hyping their discoveries with fun-sounding acronyms and lots of language such as "could one day offer" is nothing new. Human hubris knows no limits, but where are our flying cars already?
Two papers you randomly plucked out of the literature regarding graphene oxide say nothing about whether it's a useful adjuvant in the real world. Most likely it's more researchers over-hyping their research using fancy terminology such as "nano-adjuvant", which is laughable since most functional structures within cells are proteins and protein complexes that are already in the scale of nanometers, but that's usually not what people mean when they are talking about "nano" this and that.
It could be real but also a distraction from other more harmful ingredients in the drug, while also discrediting some of the graphene proponents by raising the "nanobot" theory that you have. (despite that not being what the papers say)
There may be graphene oxide in these injections, but I doubt it. I've seen the actual manufacturing protocol from various released documents, and although some details are still redacted, it's pretty clear there is no step that adds graphene oxide, so if this was to be present it would be unintentional contaminant or intentional addition outside the official protocol; in both cases the "official" documents aren't going to reveal much about this.
I'm just annoyed that people could be so stupid to mistake an electon microscopy sample preparation protocol for the manufacturing protocol for these injections. Even for someone who doesn't know about electron microscopy sample preparation, it's pretty obvious that the protocol in question doesn't refer to manufacture of the injections themselves. But one mention of the word "graphene oxide" and "OMG! I saw the word graphene oxide in a document released by Pfizer! This must mean it is really in the shots!" and we have bullshit headlines like "Pfizer Confirms Via FOIA Graphene Oxide in the Clot Shots".
Cutty cutty. Microvascular shreds.
Body-wide mesotheioma-like process, but quicker for being hydraulic...