What? This is ridiculous. I'm not going to pretend to be a retard full time to LE OWN THEM LIBS.
They are ruining the clarity of language and through that, human communication too. Should we also take another shit on it?
Even you admit it wouldn't win anything, just make the perpetually mad, whiny, bitchy libtards keep doing the same. So what's the point, other than us debasing ourselves for "the lulz" or whatever?
We would be shitting on THEIR language not language itself. I didn't say it "wouldn't win anything", I said it wouldn't win the war meaning that's it's not an end all solution. It would definitely affect their soft power which is the entire point. To appropriate their culture so that they lose their identity which reduce their ability to congregate. It's not for the "lulz", I said if all else fails, then at least they'd be mad but that's not the objective. Chill, breath, and take time to think about it before straight up dismissing it.
Oh, so we would convince the powers that be that almost everyone is "queer"? Basically giving the established left one more piece of "proof" that straights don't exist, etc.?
Yes and no. Yes, everyone would be queer. No, queer would be an alternative word for straight. The same way they muddy words like "women", we muddy their lexicon.
What? This is ridiculous. I'm not going to pretend to be a retard full time to LE OWN THEM LIBS.
They are ruining the clarity of language and through that, human communication too. Should we also take another shit on it?
Even you admit it wouldn't win anything, just make the perpetually mad, whiny, bitchy libtards keep doing the same. So what's the point, other than us debasing ourselves for "the lulz" or whatever?
We would be shitting on THEIR language not language itself. I didn't say it "wouldn't win anything", I said it wouldn't win the war meaning that's it's not an end all solution. It would definitely affect their soft power which is the entire point. To appropriate their culture so that they lose their identity which reduce their ability to congregate. It's not for the "lulz", I said if all else fails, then at least they'd be mad but that's not the objective. Chill, breath, and take time to think about it before straight up dismissing it.
Oh, so we would convince the powers that be that almost everyone is "queer"? Basically giving the established left one more piece of "proof" that straights don't exist, etc.?
Yes and no. Yes, everyone would be queer. No, queer would be an alternative word for straight. The same way they muddy words like "women", we muddy their lexicon.