Yeah outside to me is fair game. Not all vapes are truly obnoxious. A lot of 'em you'd only see thin plumes of vapor and smell candy slightly. It's a lot better than someone lighting up a cigarette next to you.
Fuck that. I had this dipshit blowing his awful smelling shit around me at a football game. Being outside did nothing to stop me having to smell what smelled like literal asshole. So I told him to cut the shit out
I've got a brother who is allergic to marijuana, needs an epi pen. A lot of vapes in Canada add marijuana oil in their mixes. I don't see the issue in asking someone not to vape if there's medical concerns. After all, they can just say "no" and keep vaping.
Honestly if someone told me they were allergic to vaping, I'd probably think they were lying. But it should rarely be a situation where someone is forced to stand in someone else's cloud.
Riiiiight, those intense smells and flavours are just water.
Don't believe the bullshit marketing, just because it's aerosolised random chemicals instead of vaporised random chemicals doesn't mean it's actually clean.
Dude has no idea what bizarre fucking home brew junk oil is in that vape, all he knows is his daughter is better off not having a taste of that rainbow.
Didn't say the world is run on the principle that the dude had to stop vaping, don't motte and bailey me. I said the rationale that "it's just second hand moisture" is categorically wrong.
Water's not even the major component, most of the cloud by weight is probably glycerol or other humectants, and it contains whatever else is in the base oil too. There's no way to say it's harmless because it's only as safe as whoever manufactured the oil. Add in that many simple chemicals that have high safe exposure limits for adults have no safe exposure limits for small children, and it's even less correct to claim it's 100% harmless to kids.
People are allowed to do things, they don't need a reason unless its crossing a line.
The fact that you think someone needs permission and justification to ask a polite question, one that involves smoking in front of a child even, at all is a far bigger problem. That's the logic of "you can prove your innocence" over just being innocent to begin with.
Iin both those cases a regular public space interaction happened with a person approaching another for a benign conversation, wherein one party responded by freaking out. Both cases the same thing applies. Dad has every right to ask a person to smoke elsewhere, with no justification needed. Vaper has every right to tell him to fuck off if he is within his right to be there. You seem to be confusing "has every right to ask" with "is in the right by asking and you must listen."
But I guess on top of thinking you need permission first to do every little thing, you are also so bad at defending that point you go trudging through profiles looking for gotchas to do it for you. So let me do it in turn:
I mean the presumption of innocence is a basic tenet of the American judicial system.
That was you, in response to Pelosi saying someone has to prove their innocence first, instead of being innocent until proven otherwise. The same kind of thinking where you are inherently in the wrong by simply talking to someone in a public space, instead of being allowed to do so (because its you know, public) until you cross some moral or legal line.
I have yet to see exactly what was going on so I can't really say if he was being a Karen or a concerned parent. The media has been too busy jerking off over everything. It being Canada all I can figure is the damn sing was acting like a fucking car on idle using rolling coal.
Because it smells like shit and stop blowing it in my direction
Yeah outside to me is fair game. Not all vapes are truly obnoxious. A lot of 'em you'd only see thin plumes of vapor and smell candy slightly. It's a lot better than someone lighting up a cigarette next to you.
Fuck that. I had this dipshit blowing his awful smelling shit around me at a football game. Being outside did nothing to stop me having to smell what smelled like literal asshole. So I told him to cut the shit out
I've got a brother who is allergic to marijuana, needs an epi pen. A lot of vapes in Canada add marijuana oil in their mixes. I don't see the issue in asking someone not to vape if there's medical concerns. After all, they can just say "no" and keep vaping.
Honestly if someone told me they were allergic to vaping, I'd probably think they were lying. But it should rarely be a situation where someone is forced to stand in someone else's cloud.
Riiiiight, those intense smells and flavours are just water.
Don't believe the bullshit marketing, just because it's aerosolised random chemicals instead of vaporised random chemicals doesn't mean it's actually clean.
Dude has no idea what bizarre fucking home brew junk oil is in that vape, all he knows is his daughter is better off not having a taste of that rainbow.
Didn't say the world is run on the principle that the dude had to stop vaping, don't motte and bailey me. I said the rationale that "it's just second hand moisture" is categorically wrong.
Water's not even the major component, most of the cloud by weight is probably glycerol or other humectants, and it contains whatever else is in the base oil too. There's no way to say it's harmless because it's only as safe as whoever manufactured the oil. Add in that many simple chemicals that have high safe exposure limits for adults have no safe exposure limits for small children, and it's even less correct to claim it's 100% harmless to kids.
People are allowed to do things, they don't need a reason unless its crossing a line.
The fact that you think someone needs permission and justification to ask a polite question, one that involves smoking in front of a child even, at all is a far bigger problem. That's the logic of "you can prove your innocence" over just being innocent to begin with.
Iin both those cases a regular public space interaction happened with a person approaching another for a benign conversation, wherein one party responded by freaking out. Both cases the same thing applies. Dad has every right to ask a person to smoke elsewhere, with no justification needed. Vaper has every right to tell him to fuck off if he is within his right to be there. You seem to be confusing "has every right to ask" with "is in the right by asking and you must listen."
But I guess on top of thinking you need permission first to do every little thing, you are also so bad at defending that point you go trudging through profiles looking for gotchas to do it for you. So let me do it in turn:
That was you, in response to Pelosi saying someone has to prove their innocence first, instead of being innocent until proven otherwise. The same kind of thinking where you are inherently in the wrong by simply talking to someone in a public space, instead of being allowed to do so (because its you know, public) until you cross some moral or legal line.
I suppose you don't see the hypocrisy.
I have yet to see exactly what was going on so I can't really say if he was being a Karen or a concerned parent. The media has been too busy jerking off over everything. It being Canada all I can figure is the damn sing was acting like a fucking car on idle using rolling coal.