Everything here is written from the perspective of a person who actually wants Russian to win, which I do not, but I am capable of writing from that perspective. Plenty of pro-Russian types on Telegram have written similar things to parts of what you will read below. The tl;dr is that Russia has been fighting this war based on foolish political calculations from Putin, not based on honest military calculations from the commanders in the field. This has caused the Russian military to grossly underperform throughout the war, which continues to this day.
Russia will win, whether you like it or not.
Except Russia is losing right now, and it is losing because it has made stupid choices that are unserious about victory every step of the way:
-
Russia tried an initial blitz strategy that assumed Ukraine would not seriously resist, when Russian intelligence told Putin Ukraine would resist, but he chose to believe his sycophants instead. The result was a debacle with enormous Russian losses and two embarrassing retreats from the North. My alternative warplan would have guaranteed Russian victory within months by pocketing and capturing the bulk of Ukraine's veteran forces.
-
After suffering initial failures and setbacks, the Russians pivoted to "Hearts of Iron artillery-only challenge" in which they burned through decades of artillery ammunition stockpiles in mere months in order to bully the Ukrainians, and only took a tiny amount of territory in exchange for moonscaping large swaths of Ukraine. Then HIMARS showed up and blew up enough ammo caches that this strategy became unsustainable a few months earlier than otherwise since Russians became ammo-constrained.
-
Sergey Surovikin was brought in and did the 1 intelligent thing Russia has done the whole war: HE WENT OVER TO THE DEFENSIVE AND STARTED TO REBUILD RUSSIAN STRENGTH. His plan was to build a strong defense, wait for the next Ukrainian offensive, crush it, then go on the counterattack with his eventual manpower advantage from mobilization, likely in late spring to summer 2023.
-
Dumbass Putin, impatient and not willing to give Surovikin's plan a chance, stepped in again with fucking Wagner & Yevgeny Prigozhin strutting with a bunch of bullshit marketing claims about how they could win the war. Wager got huge favoritism in resources and was allowed to burn through tons of men's lives in order to grind down the flanks of Bahkmut. When this eventually worked in very small ways, Putin fired Surovikin & replaced him with Valery Gerasimov with marching orders to go back on the offensive.
-
The Russian offensive which began in late January to presented, WASTED ALL THE RESOURCES Surovikin had built up, for NOTHING except a little more land around Bakhmut. This offensive was retarded, and wasted the 1 hope Russia had of making major gains, and instead completely reversed the situation so that Russia is wasting all its strength and opening itself up to a Ukrainian counter-attack JUST LIKE IT DID BEFORE AT KHARKIV. Russia should have been setting up for a Kursk type battle, and instead it just wasted whatever benefits it had from the 1st round of mobilization to set itself up for a Case Blue.
If things continue as they are now, and there is every reason to believe they will, Russia will keep exhausting itself until it completely loses offensive potential. Then Ukraine will counter-attack and likely will break through in at least one area. Whether this break through will be successfully exploited will depend on many factors, but the Russians have put themselves in the worst possible position, all because of emotionally driven and politically driven bungling.
Who are the pro-Russian types you follow on Telegram? The ones I follow engage in pretty appalling jingoism, calling their opponents 'Ukrainian pigs' and 'kholkhols'.
Here's my counterpoint:
So far, I'm going with "imperial defeat". In fact, if Russia can keep this up without its economy collapsing or the US dragging Europe into a nuclear exchange, I'd say that this does more damage to the globalist regime than a quick Russian victory would have. The US and EU have no interest in Ukraine beyond their lust for power and empire. But to put all your cards on the table and then still lose to a country with 1/13 the military expenditure of the US is glorious.
Russia cannot lose. It has 4 times the military-aged manpower of Ukraine. It has vastly more industry. And like Obama said, it cares more about Ukraine than the Empire does, so it will always be able to establish escalatory dominance there. Right now, Russia is fighting with both hands tied behind its back. If Russia starts actually losing, it will take out one of those hands and stomp the corrupt non-country. If that doesn't help, the other hand comes out. If that doesn't work, China will send vast amounts of aid. Victory is impossible for the empire.
The question is who many Ukrainians have to die before their puppet regime can not longer coerce the populace into being Biden's cannon fodder. They will feel betrayed when they realize that the corrupt West sent them to their deaths to kill their Russian brothers, when there is no prospect of victory, but only for the corrupt interest of weakening Russia.
Kinda agree without the Taiwan part for one single reason: it's leaders weren't idiots
Taiwan knew the communists would attempt to take Taiwan (in fact Mao tried....he failed spectacularly. Then kept artillery striking an island they owned till Truman literally went 'stop or I'll nuke you') so the island itself is designed as a fortress. Aircraft are stored in bunkers, the motorways have been designed to serve as redundant landing and takeoff strips for jets. Couple this with China wanting to claim the very industry in Taiwan which means they can't just carpet bomb everything means that so long as they hold ground (very easy to do given the geography and amount of viable beachheads for an invasion) then support from nearby JDSF and Americans can arrive in time to drive them back.
It's not a 'China has no way of winning' but there are enough factors that even with a dementia pedo in charge of it's main strategic ally, it has a good chance at halting any invasion and then forcing the Chinese into a humiliating retreat. Just doing that is an extreme risk to Xi's authority.
There is also something to be said for the fact that Taiwan has openly said they will take a "If I cant have it, no one can" attitude to their chip factories. And China doesnt have the tech know-how to run those factories even if they managed to capture them intact.
Either way, I dont really fear China going after Taiwan. Because when they ran a wargame recently on the subject (which are designed from the ground up to favor REDFOR and hamper BLUEFOR, even if it means ignoring actual, real life physics), and it saw REDFOR get their ass spanked, which isnt how that is supposed to work. So I can only imagine how much worse it would actually be for them.
US pols are getting a lot of mileage out of an invasion of Taiwan that doesn't seem to be in China's interest. As usual, "it's not the Chinese."
Denying those fabs to the west would be more than enough long term gain to justify an invasion. TSMC presently makes up the bulk of chip output for the planet.
That is starting to go away though, since TSMC is teaming up with some US companies to build new factories in the US itself (in Arizona, Ohio, and Texas).