I've never heard of that because I don't get the FSB contractor morning brief
Not sure who you think you're owning with this sort of comment. Yourself, mostly. But self-awareness was never an American thing.
What I DO know is that there are a bunch of photos of T-54 tanks on a train leaving the storage depot and heading to Ukraine.
You are suddenly an expert on Russian train schedules now? When were those pictures taken? Where are they going? And how did you discover that?
Except nobody believes that, not even you.
I have trouble believing that you think everyone who disagrees with you is an FSB employee (sry CONTRACTOR, because you can divine someone's employment status as well as nationality), but because it's funny and makes you look ridiculous, I'll keep bringing it up.
It's also laughably untrue since the CIA is full of libtards and I'm very right wing.
You're a neocon.
I don't believe your claims to live in some unspecified country that totally isn't Russia. You're either an ethnic russian nationalist living abroad rooting for your ethnostate, or someone in russia itself. It makes no difference.
LOL! This is phenomenal! A while back, you claimed that I supposedly defend blacks because I am "darker-skinned". Now I'm a Russian.
YES, THERE ARE DARKER-SKINNED RUSSIANS, AND YOU ARE ONE! LIKE PUSHKIN, BUT WITHOUT TALENT! Oh, and Russia is still an ethnostate! I found out about it while studying Russina trains schedules.
I can model how a person like that would behave, there are plenty of other examples of it even in this forum, and you're too inconsistent with it.
Show me your model, Greta.
The talking points of a russian nationalist differ from a right winger who favors russia for culture war issues, and you fall very strongly on the "russian nationalist" model in your responses, not the culture warrior.
And leftists from your shithole were equally certain that there is no way that I'm not white, because... anyone who disagrees with them is white. This is embarrassing, but very funny.
There has never been any admission that the early few cases of genuine brain damage were "a total fraud" and it remains the assessment of the US government that those cases were likely caused by a weapon.
OH WOW, the US GOVERNMENT! I thought you were going to cite an entity with little credibility, not one that has credibility coming out of its wazoo like the US GOVERNMENT!
No, they did not. Straw man attack. A microwave weapon would not make a sound, and thus could not be recorded.
They literally recorded crickets and said that this was the weapon from the 23rd century that definitely damaged their brains.
You're 100% wrong about what I believe and why. you're clearly arguing in bad faith.
Even on this very thread, I'm defending you against accusations that you are a "shill". Because I don't think you are. A deranged neocon (at least on some issues), yes. A shill, no... even as you make accusations that you must know you are false. But you have a persecution complex.
False, and quickly retracted by that Israeli dumbfuck who implied it.
The "dumbfuck" being the Prime Minister of Israel? A guy who actually tried to make peace, rather than sabotage it like the imperials did?
Nope. I don't have any of the characteristics of a "neocon". I know in your mind, you are using "neocon" to mean "American nationalist", which I am, but that's not what "neocon" actually means.
Neocons are left wingers: "Neoconservatism is a political movement that began in the United States during the 1960s among liberal hawks who became disenchanted with the increasingly pacifist foreign policy of the Democratic Party" ... "Neoconservatives typically advocate the promotion of democracy"
I'm on the record as opposing US military power to "promote democracy" and I have openly advocated that the US should have installed a puppet regime in Afghanistan which would have been in line with Afghan cultural values, meaning sharia law and no rights for women. The sole purpose of the "puppet" should have been to suppress terrorism/drugs, and otherwise the US had no business in Afghanistan.
I've also outright attacked Neocons as having divided loyalties and being motivated by furthering the interests of Israel at the expensive of the United States, particularly where almost all the prominent neocons were zionist jews.
YES, THERE ARE DARKER-SKINNED RUSSIANS, AND YOU ARE ONE! LIKE PUSHKIN, BUT WITHOUT TALENT!
Nope. I don't have any of the characteristics of a "neocon". I know in your mind, you are using "neocon" to mean "American nationalist", which I am, but that's not what "neocon" actually means.
You are incorrect about that. I am a nationalist, but that does not require you to approve of everything that criminal regime does. "My country right or wrong" is not nationalism, it is just retardation.
I've also outright attacked Neocons as having divided loyalties and being motivated by furthering the interests of Israel at the expensive of the United States, particularly where almost all the prominent neocons were zionist jews.
And yet your opinions on Malorussiya are 100% consistent with the opinions of David Frum, David French, and the rest of the neocon bunch, and trying to pander to anti-Jewish sentiment on this sub does not erase that.
See, it's not an ETHNOSTATE! Black cocktails are as welcome as white vodka.
Seriously, it's crazy how Americans try to persuade themselves that everyone who disagrees with them is white / Russian / whatever. Tell me how you are different from the left. The American left and right are often two groups of loudmouths who pretend to hate each other while being either identical or mirror images of each other.
And yet your opinions on Malorussiya are 100% consistent with the opinions of David Frum, David French, and the rest of the neocon bunch, and trying to pander to anti-Jewish sentiment on this sub does not erase that.
Your argument is that just because I'm against Russia, and these other people are against Russia, that means I am in 100% agreement with them on every other issue, which is laughably wrong and anyone familiar with my comments/posts and those leftist clowns would know.
A plurality/majority of American conservatives support Ukraine. That doesn't make them "neocons".
Your argument is that just because I'm against Russia, and these other people are against Russia, that means I am in 100% agreement with them on every other issue
The same argument you make about other people and their alleged affiliation with the FSB, even though I have no idea what their opinion is on this conflict, and I don't think you do either. Apparently, you don't think they will do anything if Putin gives up Russian territory, so they have no opinions at all.
which is laughably wrong and anyone familiar with my comments/posts and those leftist clowns would know.
I'll say one thing, while you say that you argued against the destruction of Yugoslavia in college, you also made some pretty bizarre claims about Yugoslavia "invading Kosovo" like you did about Russia "invading Chechnya".
A plurality/majority of American conservatives support Ukraine. That doesn't make them "neocons".
No, it makes them stupid. The same people who have been 'fighting' for decades, who have conserved absolutely nothing except for the profits of Goldman Sachs, and who now have their kids groomed in schools. They don't realize that their enemies are their own politicians, not BAD RUSSIAN MAN.
/u/AntonioOfVenice uses "neocon" for even the European libs, it's just a meaningless insult, something alike the tankies ever screaming about Nazis everywhere. KIEV NAZI JUNTA too of course, it used to be "fascists" since the 1920s like we were the "White Polish fascists" and the German Social-Democrats were the "social fascists" or whatever they called them - the British and the Americans were just "the imperialists" tho (I honestly don't know what they called the French and I don't even remember anyone being accused-declared of being a French spy in their purges and show trials, or any anti-French posters, so I guess they just ignored France for most part?). So anyway he's a weido just like them. He's also simply very thick headed and you're wasting your time arguing anything with him if you hope to convince him after he unquestionably absorbed a really crude propaganda (I don't know why anyone should really try even). Speaking of which, that was my parting message for him on the issue: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16aTebfJEx/x/c/4TsYQX40PXt
"White Polish" was their stupid projection from having Red and White (and Black and some other) Russians during their civil war. They sometimes still use it today, and regard the Polish-Bolshevik war as a part of their civil war. In reality the main Polish political faction at the time was the Polish Socialist Party which had participated in the 1905 Russian revolution under red flags, but still was very much "Polish" indeed, and the restoration of the independent Poland was always its main aim since its foundation. Their program was also some sort a federation-alliance with Ukraine, as well as Lithuania and Belarus and maybe even others (but of course it didn't work out):
The new opportunities that Poland saw were a result of Germany and Russia’s defeat in the First World War. Poland, seeing a geopolitical vacuum in the East, came up with three visions. The first was a recreation of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth through a federation of Poland, Belarus and Lithuania (and maybe Latvia) that would be closely allied with an independent Ukraine. The second vision, called Prometheism, was the liberation of non-Russian nations. At a later stage it was also to offer support to non-communist Russian left groups. The third vision, Intermarium, foresaw co-operation among the newly independent states located between the Baltic, the Black and possibly the Adriatic Seas.
Not sure who you think you're owning with this sort of comment. Yourself, mostly. But self-awareness was never an American thing.
You are suddenly an expert on Russian train schedules now? When were those pictures taken? Where are they going? And how did you discover that?
I have trouble believing that you think everyone who disagrees with you is an FSB employee (sry CONTRACTOR, because you can divine someone's employment status as well as nationality), but because it's funny and makes you look ridiculous, I'll keep bringing it up.
You're a neocon.
LOL! This is phenomenal! A while back, you claimed that I supposedly defend blacks because I am "darker-skinned". Now I'm a Russian.
YES, THERE ARE DARKER-SKINNED RUSSIANS, AND YOU ARE ONE! LIKE PUSHKIN, BUT WITHOUT TALENT! Oh, and Russia is still an ethnostate! I found out about it while studying Russina trains schedules.
Show me your model, Greta.
And leftists from your shithole were equally certain that there is no way that I'm not white, because... anyone who disagrees with them is white. This is embarrassing, but very funny.
OH WOW, the US GOVERNMENT! I thought you were going to cite an entity with little credibility, not one that has credibility coming out of its wazoo like the US GOVERNMENT!
They literally recorded crickets and said that this was the weapon from the 23rd century that definitely damaged their brains.
Even on this very thread, I'm defending you against accusations that you are a "shill". Because I don't think you are. A deranged neocon (at least on some issues), yes. A shill, no... even as you make accusations that you must know you are false. But you have a persecution complex.
The "dumbfuck" being the Prime Minister of Israel? A guy who actually tried to make peace, rather than sabotage it like the imperials did?
A culture warrior would never care about peace.
Nope. I don't have any of the characteristics of a "neocon". I know in your mind, you are using "neocon" to mean "American nationalist", which I am, but that's not what "neocon" actually means.
Neocons are left wingers: "Neoconservatism is a political movement that began in the United States during the 1960s among liberal hawks who became disenchanted with the increasingly pacifist foreign policy of the Democratic Party" ... "Neoconservatives typically advocate the promotion of democracy"
I'm on the record as opposing US military power to "promote democracy" and I have openly advocated that the US should have installed a puppet regime in Afghanistan which would have been in line with Afghan cultural values, meaning sharia law and no rights for women. The sole purpose of the "puppet" should have been to suppress terrorism/drugs, and otherwise the US had no business in Afghanistan.
I've also outright attacked Neocons as having divided loyalties and being motivated by furthering the interests of Israel at the expensive of the United States, particularly where almost all the prominent neocons were zionist jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Russian
You are incorrect about that. I am a nationalist, but that does not require you to approve of everything that criminal regime does. "My country right or wrong" is not nationalism, it is just retardation.
And yet your opinions on Malorussiya are 100% consistent with the opinions of David Frum, David French, and the rest of the neocon bunch, and trying to pander to anti-Jewish sentiment on this sub does not erase that.
See, it's not an ETHNOSTATE! Black cocktails are as welcome as white vodka.
Seriously, it's crazy how Americans try to persuade themselves that everyone who disagrees with them is white / Russian / whatever. Tell me how you are different from the left. The American left and right are often two groups of loudmouths who pretend to hate each other while being either identical or mirror images of each other.
Your argument is that just because I'm against Russia, and these other people are against Russia, that means I am in 100% agreement with them on every other issue, which is laughably wrong and anyone familiar with my comments/posts and those leftist clowns would know.
A plurality/majority of American conservatives support Ukraine. That doesn't make them "neocons".
The same argument you make about other people and their alleged affiliation with the FSB, even though I have no idea what their opinion is on this conflict, and I don't think you do either. Apparently, you don't think they will do anything if Putin gives up Russian territory, so they have no opinions at all.
I'll say one thing, while you say that you argued against the destruction of Yugoslavia in college, you also made some pretty bizarre claims about Yugoslavia "invading Kosovo" like you did about Russia "invading Chechnya".
No, it makes them stupid. The same people who have been 'fighting' for decades, who have conserved absolutely nothing except for the profits of Goldman Sachs, and who now have their kids groomed in schools. They don't realize that their enemies are their own politicians, not BAD RUSSIAN MAN.
/u/AntonioOfVenice uses "neocon" for even the European libs, it's just a meaningless insult, something alike the tankies ever screaming about Nazis everywhere. KIEV NAZI JUNTA too of course, it used to be "fascists" since the 1920s like we were the "White Polish fascists" and the German Social-Democrats were the "social fascists" or whatever they called them - the British and the Americans were just "the imperialists" tho (I honestly don't know what they called the French and I don't even remember anyone being accused-declared of being a French spy in their purges and show trials, or any anti-French posters, so I guess they just ignored France for most part?). So anyway he's a weido just like them. He's also simply very thick headed and you're wasting your time arguing anything with him if you hope to convince him after he unquestionably absorbed a really crude propaganda (I don't know why anyone should really try even). Speaking of which, that was my parting message for him on the issue: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16aTebfJEx/x/c/4TsYQX40PXt
"White Polish" was their stupid projection from having Red and White (and Black and some other) Russians during their civil war. They sometimes still use it today, and regard the Polish-Bolshevik war as a part of their civil war. In reality the main Polish political faction at the time was the Polish Socialist Party which had participated in the 1905 Russian revolution under red flags, but still was very much "Polish" indeed, and the restoration of the independent Poland was always its main aim since its foundation. Their program was also some sort a federation-alliance with Ukraine, as well as Lithuania and Belarus and maybe even others (but of course it didn't work out):
More about these 3 concepts (sometimes going even as far as the Central Asia): https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/11/05/independence-poland-1918/