Forgery means that it's fake. And it is. Because it was plagiarized from a book that had a dialogue between Napoleon III and Machiavelli, not any 'Elders'.
You have to be a complete moron to buy into this more than 100 years after the fact. Even Goebbels, who was highly inclined to believe it because it suited him, recognized it as a total fake, because he had a modicum of intelligence and wit. Modern day Nazis unfortunately lack the erudition of Goebbels.
Give it a rest. It's a plagariarist forgery created by the Okhrana.
Plagiarism and forgery mean it was copied from another source, not that they are fake or false.
Forgery means that it's fake. And it is. Because it was plagiarized from a book that had a dialogue between Napoleon III and Machiavelli, not any 'Elders'.
You have to be a complete moron to buy into this more than 100 years after the fact. Even Goebbels, who was highly inclined to believe it because it suited him, recognized it as a total fake, because he had a modicum of intelligence and wit. Modern day Nazis unfortunately lack the erudition of Goebbels.
And the modern man Goebbels it up.
Not only that but it's a generic, vague list of "do bad stuff" that inevitably happens in all aging empires.
You're not wrong. You'd think we'd have learned the tells by now. Information age, making us all dumber. SNR is always a killer.
Can you provide original page and edition numbers for your claims?
OK, so you can't provide citations.
So you ask me for citations to cover your failure. Am I citing a book? I'm not. So 'original page' is your failed attempt to sound clever.