To increase the birthrate, you should take a fresh look at child labour laws.
The primary factor that decreases birthrates more than anything else is that we have created a world where children are money pits. In countries with healthy birth rates, children are assets, not liabilities.
Let children work.
With remote work, there is even less of an argument against it.
13 year olds can do TPS reports.
10 year olds can sort the mail.
How long will it be before it switches from “children can work too” to “children HAVE TO work too”?
Increasing the labour pool will drive down wages further (the way it did when women entered the workforce). Also, everything’s tending towards automation now anyway, there may not be actual jobs available for those kids. Also also, knowing the left as we do, I have absofuckinglutely zero doubt that as soon as children are working and earning their own incomes it will be used to further fracture the nuclear family, get kids to emancipate themselves earlier and usher in the “love knows no age” laws the libs are moist to sign off on.
How long will it be before it switches from “children can work too” to “children HAVE TO work too”?
Who fucking cares?
The white man conquered nearly three quarters of the earth during the centuries while children worked. Then children stopped working, and our population instantly began to stagnate, and then shrink.
Fixing the birthrate is of existential importance. No price is too high to pay, for the alternative is oblivion.
Our birthrates would be higher if we banned the pill and abortion for anything but rape, incest, and dead mom/baby scenarios. Remove any gender-specific protections for women in the workplace as these do not protect them so much as give them ammunition to attack others. Disincentivize education for women. Any advantage given to women and girls should be eliminated. Sexism is destroying our culture and our birthrates.
Children can work with a parent's agreement in Québec ( well, untill the retards in governments ban kids picking fruits in the Summer "because other countries are judging us for allowing children to work!" )
White Québécois have a fertily index around 1.2 - 1.4 ( below the 2.1+ necessary for maintenance, below the
12+ necessary to match mass migration ).
Fertility of familes on farms, where children could still work, crashed too.
The problems run much deeper. The way we teach kids, what we teach them, how long we keep them in schools, contraception, physical inactivity making us less fit/attractive, culture, mass migration, government replacing religion as charity, wellfare, white guilt, male guilt, feminist brainwashing and grievance mongering, anxiety-inducing media, all of it contribute.
There you go again, using a word that did not even exist until more than half way through the 1800's.
It was first used by English novelist William Makepeace Thackeray, where he used the word refer to the act of having capital. The word he had coined was then seized upon by communists.
Ask yourself, what IS 'capitalism'?
It is simply, just as Thackeray intended, the act of owning something. This is why Communists talk about abolishing private property.
Humans have owned property for all of human history, and private finance is not a recent invention, it has existed since the movement primitive tribesmen their goods and cattle.
'Capitalism' is the default state of human existence.
When you say 'Capitalists: Not once', you are regurgitating communist mindrot that you have been poisoned with.
Forget the word 'Capitalism'. It was corrupted by communists the moment it was coined.
To increase the birthrate, you should take a fresh look at child labour laws.
The primary factor that decreases birthrates more than anything else is that we have created a world where children are money pits. In countries with healthy birth rates, children are assets, not liabilities.
Let children work.
With remote work, there is even less of an argument against it.
13 year olds can do TPS reports. 10 year olds can sort the mail.
How long will it be before it switches from “children can work too” to “children HAVE TO work too”?
Increasing the labour pool will drive down wages further (the way it did when women entered the workforce). Also, everything’s tending towards automation now anyway, there may not be actual jobs available for those kids. Also also, knowing the left as we do, I have absofuckinglutely zero doubt that as soon as children are working and earning their own incomes it will be used to further fracture the nuclear family, get kids to emancipate themselves earlier and usher in the “love knows no age” laws the libs are moist to sign off on.
Who fucking cares?
The white man conquered nearly three quarters of the earth during the centuries while children worked. Then children stopped working, and our population instantly began to stagnate, and then shrink.
Fixing the birthrate is of existential importance. No price is too high to pay, for the alternative is oblivion.
On this we DO agree 100%
Our birthrates would be higher if we banned the pill and abortion for anything but rape, incest, and dead mom/baby scenarios. Remove any gender-specific protections for women in the workplace as these do not protect them so much as give them ammunition to attack others. Disincentivize education for women. Any advantage given to women and girls should be eliminated. Sexism is destroying our culture and our birthrates.
Children can work with a parent's agreement in Québec ( well, untill the retards in governments ban kids picking fruits in the Summer "because other countries are judging us for allowing children to work!" )
White Québécois have a fertily index around 1.2 - 1.4 ( below the 2.1+ necessary for maintenance, below the 12+ necessary to match mass migration ).
Fertility of familes on farms, where children could still work, crashed too.
The problems run much deeper. The way we teach kids, what we teach them, how long we keep them in schools, contraception, physical inactivity making us less fit/attractive, culture, mass migration, government replacing religion as charity, wellfare, white guilt, male guilt, feminist brainwashing and grievance mongering, anxiety-inducing media, all of it contribute.
There's no such thing as capitalism. Stop adopting marxist framing.
There you go again, using a word that did not even exist until more than half way through the 1800's.
It was first used by English novelist William Makepeace Thackeray, where he used the word refer to the act of having capital. The word he had coined was then seized upon by communists.
Ask yourself, what IS 'capitalism'?
It is simply, just as Thackeray intended, the act of owning something. This is why Communists talk about abolishing private property.
Humans have owned property for all of human history, and private finance is not a recent invention, it has existed since the movement primitive tribesmen their goods and cattle.
'Capitalism' is the default state of human existence.
When you say 'Capitalists: Not once', you are regurgitating communist mindrot that you have been poisoned with.
Forget the word 'Capitalism'. It was corrupted by communists the moment it was coined.