It is though. By what mechanism would a retarded organization in Davos seek to 'control the world'? There is none. They certainly are sinister, but for different reasons than 'controlling the world', which that cartoon villain Klaus Schwab doesn't do despite his statements that zey penetrate ze cabinets.
The don't seek to control the world. They already have the control. Nearly every government, every mega corp, every decabillionair are all members or controlled by members of the WEF. WEF is a cartel. They meet to make sure all members are at least not working against each other and their messaging is the same.
Yes, like I said, it's a very sinister organization, but to say that they 'control' the world is an exaggeration into orbit somewhere. The problem is that they connect all sorts of malefactors, allow them to co-ordinate their actions and their messaging as you say, and come with sinister ideas that then get pushed to governments which are receptive to them.
I don't trust Peterson but the vague idea that we need alternative forms of Earth-scale international cooperation and culture is correct. Globalization eventually leads to globalism, you're not going to get rid of globalization but you can be "actively anti-globalist."
We have to learn how to deal with it with different forms of international alliances, legal frameworks, and trade organizations. Parallel governance has to be established from the bottom to the top. You need a global culture that is not the American Liberal hegemon, but American nationalists will never acquiesce to a system that doesn't make America the dominant voice in the conversation.
For example most on the right want to get rid of the UN, but I think we need an anti-UN. Anti-utopian and multi-dimensional are sweet nothings to my ears.
It sounds like he should be working with the WSF and Public Eye though, were he actually genuine.
The wef isn't a meme tard
It is though. By what mechanism would a retarded organization in Davos seek to 'control the world'? There is none. They certainly are sinister, but for different reasons than 'controlling the world', which that cartoon villain Klaus Schwab doesn't do despite his statements that zey penetrate ze cabinets.
The don't seek to control the world. They already have the control. Nearly every government, every mega corp, every decabillionair are all members or controlled by members of the WEF. WEF is a cartel. They meet to make sure all members are at least not working against each other and their messaging is the same.
Yes, like I said, it's a very sinister organization, but to say that they 'control' the world is an exaggeration into orbit somewhere. The problem is that they connect all sorts of malefactors, allow them to co-ordinate their actions and their messaging as you say, and come with sinister ideas that then get pushed to governments which are receptive to them.
I don't trust Peterson but the vague idea that we need alternative forms of Earth-scale international cooperation and culture is correct. Globalization eventually leads to globalism, you're not going to get rid of globalization but you can be "actively anti-globalist."
We have to learn how to deal with it with different forms of international alliances, legal frameworks, and trade organizations. Parallel governance has to be established from the bottom to the top. You need a global culture that is not the American Liberal hegemon, but American nationalists will never acquiesce to a system that doesn't make America the dominant voice in the conversation.
For example most on the right want to get rid of the UN, but I think we need an anti-UN. Anti-utopian and multi-dimensional are sweet nothings to my ears.
It sounds like he should be working with the WSF and Public Eye though, were he actually genuine.