The politics involving male contraceptive development has always been so peculiar.
On one hand, there's been feminists who've been afraid that it take away from the power that female contraception has given women, and fear giving men more power in the equation.
On the other hand, there has been legitimate concern (especially for men) whether or not such developed treatments would actually prove detrimental to male health.
And then you've of course got the recent leftist promotion of trying to push vasectomy on men.
In the early study in mice, funded by the US National Institutes of Health and published in the journal Nature Communications, a single dose of the drug, called TDI-11861, immobilised sperm before, during and after mating.
The effect lasted for around three hours. By 24 hours, it appeared to have fully worn off. One of the scientists, Dr Melanie Balbach from Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, said it showed promise as a reversible, easy-to-use contraceptive.
I wonder if I should archive that link before they scrub all reference to sperm being able to survive inside the woman.
This might be my most tinfoil theory yet, but what are the odds of a feminist-compromised NIH and FDA pushing out a pill that they know won't work, to help women trap men more easily, and the establishment right will say nothing because it pushes up their precious birth rates?
This kinda thing only increases STD rates and gives their whores cancer. A chemical that does this to a man will definitely spread through the seminal fluid. What do you think that will do to a woman once it's in her vagina? There's already a growing number of women who are unable to have sex due to various chemical reactions, this will make it worse.
This is to say, it's being pushed by useful idiot feminists and big pharma for money.
The politics involving male contraceptive development has always been so peculiar.
On one hand, there's been feminists who've been afraid that it take away from the power that female contraception has given women, and fear giving men more power in the equation.
On the other hand, there has been legitimate concern (especially for men) whether or not such developed treatments would actually prove detrimental to male health.
And then you've of course got the recent leftist promotion of trying to push vasectomy on men.
https://www.clearblue.com/fertility/how-long-sperm-live
Fuck off, Fauci. Or should I say Christine Grady, who remains at the NIH while Fraudci is a discarded puppet.
What a surprise, women trying to push a defective medical treatment on us. Can't remember the last time that happened.
Lovely. There is a reason there is only male STERILITY pills.
I wonder if I should archive that link before they scrub all reference to sperm being able to survive inside the woman.
This might be my most tinfoil theory yet, but what are the odds of a feminist-compromised NIH and FDA pushing out a pill that they know won't work, to help women trap men more easily, and the establishment right will say nothing because it pushes up their precious birth rates?
Here you go.
Archive Today: https://archive.is/8gSb2
Wayback Machine Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20220712215506/https://www.clearblue.com/fertility/how-long-sperm-live
This kinda thing only increases STD rates and gives their whores cancer. A chemical that does this to a man will definitely spread through the seminal fluid. What do you think that will do to a woman once it's in her vagina? There's already a growing number of women who are unable to have sex due to various chemical reactions, this will make it worse.
This is to say, it's being pushed by useful idiot feminists and big pharma for money.
It would be wonderful is a such a pill could put the power of conception on equal footing with women. As it is now, they have way too much power.
I've been waiting years for something like this and here it is, at a time where I won't trust anyone from the "community" as far as I can throw them