You'll learn eventually, but by then they'll probably have you in fucking chains. I don't even mean that figuratively. The draft laws for Internet speech, conduct in public places and conduct in private places are all drafted by women's groups and all have huge overreach targeted at men.
u/TheOpiner - you had the details on this, didn't you?
So we now have the (un)holy trinity of laws - the Online Safety Bill for online behaviour and communication, the Protection from Sex-based Harassment in Public Bill for public spaces and the Worker Protection Bill for private spaces.
Downvoters are ridiculous...what women are planning will put men on a path of being less than even second-class citizens in that country.
There is no bigger issue than making sure they don't get those laws passed in any form.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm saying that this is a propped up distraction and people should know better.
If women feminists (happy now, downvoters?) get through 2023 with no resistance to their plans, the UK will be worse than CCP China. And that's just based off what they wrote down.
This is a fight for the right to live a normal life. There's no higher stakes than preventing a law that will get you jailed for looking at a woman wrong, like has already been tried by TfL.
The two party system has failed to stop their obvious malice and it's down to the people of that country to at least show their displeasure at their rulers, at least show that this isn't happening unopposed.
I can't stress this enough - this is not my usual inference of actions based on a belief of malice.
These ideas have already been trialled, they're going nationwide.
When you start the thread defending pedos, it's a bit too late to try to pretend to be sane later on.
Here's me rewriting your comment in a way that is sane.
This is obviously really bad, but we need to keep our eyes on the ball. The proposed 'misogyny' law would do immeasurable and permanent damage to everyone's rights in the UK, compared to which an underage girl being solicited is of comparatively minor significance. And I have noticed a pattern where such incidents are used to enact sweeping legislation that create wrongs far greater than the original wrong they were supposedly meant to address.
Due to the influence of feminist activists in both parties, the two party system has failed to actually represent ordinary people rather than activism. So it's up to us to show that we are not happy with the way things are going.
You may judge my comment based on my reputation, but that's not the case at all. If this law passes, all that's necessary for your freedom to be taken away is an unsubstantiated accusation that a woman makes.
The migrant rape gangs were ignored for the last decade and now it's finally getting mainstream attention... curiously coinciding with a push to pass some absurd and severe "anti-misogyny" laws...
The correct course of action would be to send all the migrants back to the 3rd world, but because it's Britain, they're trying to build bridges, not walls, so they build tiny walls on all their bridges to stop the van attacks. Likewise, criminalizing staring will not be enforced on migrants in no-go zones.
No, it isn't. It's the same transparent hoax they pulled last time they were planning a huge attack on men's human rights.
"Get angry about something, anything but what we have planned for you."
You'll learn eventually, but by then they'll probably have you in fucking chains. I don't even mean that figuratively. The draft laws for Internet speech, conduct in public places and conduct in private places are all drafted by women's groups and all have huge overreach targeted at men.
u/TheOpiner - you had the details on this, didn't you?
Downvoters are ridiculous...what women are planning will put men on a path of being less than even second-class citizens in that country.
There is no bigger issue than making sure they don't get those laws passed in any form.
You are defending a slaver's cult that still practices slavery today.
Correction: Pedophile slaver warlord.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm saying that this is a propped up distraction and people should know better.
If
womenfeminists (happy now, downvoters?) get through 2023 with no resistance to their plans, the UK will be worse than CCP China. And that's just based off what they wrote down.This is a fight for the right to live a normal life. There's no higher stakes than preventing a law that will get you jailed for looking at a woman wrong, like has already been tried by TfL.
The two party system has failed to stop their obvious malice and it's down to the people of that country to at least show their displeasure at their rulers, at least show that this isn't happening unopposed.
I can't stress this enough - this is not my usual inference of actions based on a belief of malice.
These ideas have already been trialled, they're going nationwide.
Freedom ends at a woman's pointing finger.
When you start the thread defending pedos, it's a bit too late to try to pretend to be sane later on.
Here's me rewriting your comment in a way that is sane.
This is obviously really bad, but we need to keep our eyes on the ball. The proposed 'misogyny' law would do immeasurable and permanent damage to everyone's rights in the UK, compared to which an underage girl being solicited is of comparatively minor significance. And I have noticed a pattern where such incidents are used to enact sweeping legislation that create wrongs far greater than the original wrong they were supposedly meant to address.
Due to the influence of feminist activists in both parties, the two party system has failed to actually represent ordinary people rather than activism. So it's up to us to show that we are not happy with the way things are going.
You may judge my comment based on my reputation, but that's not the case at all. If this law passes, all that's necessary for your freedom to be taken away is an unsubstantiated accusation that a woman makes.
Its amazing how when you strip away the schizobabble, there is that truth in the center.
The migrant rape gangs were ignored for the last decade and now it's finally getting mainstream attention... curiously coinciding with a push to pass some absurd and severe "anti-misogyny" laws...
The correct course of action would be to send all the migrants back to the 3rd world, but because it's Britain, they're trying to build bridges, not walls, so they build tiny walls on all their bridges to stop the van attacks. Likewise, criminalizing staring will not be enforced on migrants in no-go zones.
Thank you, I think.
No wonder you side with your people, you seethe at White people not tolerating your 3rd world ways.
The Imp is white. And pls don't associate the rest of us with Islamic ways.
You are once again your own worst enemy.
You almost always have at least a sliver of a valid point. Often more than a sliver, and often extremely valid and important.
But you always overshadow it with your male genocide and Big Whamen insanity.