I’d go so far as to say that the identity politics ceasefire of the 90s and 00s, commonly referred to as “colorblindness”, was clearly a psyop designed to disarm whites in advance of today’s racial thunderdome. At no point have non-whites ever collectively put aside their racial/ethnic solidarity or advocacy in observance of colorblindness. Only whites were expected to do so, and only whites did. Now we find ourselves trapped in “democracies” with rapidly expanding non-white demographics who are actively hostile to our continued existence.
I want to disagree with you but I can’t and I hate that you are right. I adhere to the colorblind philosophy but I’m just one person and I see everything you’ve said. I do believe the tide can turn though. Granted as I’ve grown older I’ve become much more optimistic but I do think it’s possible
Seeing white people castrate their own culture whilst everyone else is championing their own is fucking bizzare. It's not virtuous. Just be proud of yourself. No, don't try to redefine "pride", and "self", fucking own it.
This makes no sense. The opposite of atomization is community, and Identity politics are precisely where people have always found community. The only other remotely competitive source is organized religion, and those institutions are very much on the decline.
The best defense is a good offense. The best deterrent is a big stick. Fences make for good neighbors. No matter how you slice it, white identity politics are good, necessary, and inevitable. When whites have the same solidarity and advocacy as every other racial/ethnic demographic, then we can consider a ceasefire - but only one that binds us all.
Living harmoniously in a post-imperialist world means we need to try to end tribalism but neo-Marxists will not let us.
That said, I don't see how joining the identity struggle helps anything but the neo-Marxists who instituted it in the first place. At the same time I am galled by having to take anti-white racism sitting down.
I’d go so far as to say that the identity politics ceasefire of the 90s and 00s, commonly referred to as “colorblindness”, was clearly a psyop designed to disarm whites in advance of today’s racial thunderdome. At no point have non-whites ever collectively put aside their racial/ethnic solidarity or advocacy in observance of colorblindness. Only whites were expected to do so, and only whites did. Now we find ourselves trapped in “democracies” with rapidly expanding non-white demographics who are actively hostile to our continued existence.
I want to disagree with you but I can’t and I hate that you are right. I adhere to the colorblind philosophy but I’m just one person and I see everything you’ve said. I do believe the tide can turn though. Granted as I’ve grown older I’ve become much more optimistic but I do think it’s possible
Seeing white people castrate their own culture whilst everyone else is championing their own is fucking bizzare. It's not virtuous. Just be proud of yourself. No, don't try to redefine "pride", and "self", fucking own it.
This makes no sense. The opposite of atomization is community, and Identity politics are precisely where people have always found community. The only other remotely competitive source is organized religion, and those institutions are very much on the decline.
The best defense is a good offense. The best deterrent is a big stick. Fences make for good neighbors. No matter how you slice it, white identity politics are good, necessary, and inevitable. When whites have the same solidarity and advocacy as every other racial/ethnic demographic, then we can consider a ceasefire - but only one that binds us all.
Things have changed since Spengler's day.
Living harmoniously in a post-imperialist world means we need to try to end tribalism but neo-Marxists will not let us.
That said, I don't see how joining the identity struggle helps anything but the neo-Marxists who instituted it in the first place. At the same time I am galled by having to take anti-white racism sitting down.