Two young women who denied being trafficked by Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan did not understand that they were enslaved as they had been brainwashed, a Romanian court has ruled.
The two women both claimed that they worked voluntarily for Andrew and Tristan Tate but a report prepared by a clinical psychologist said they were both left with trauma and did not recognise that they were being exploited.
If it was not clear already that this case is a rigged hit on Tate ordered by higher ups in the Romanian government, it should be crystal clear now.
The Romanian court ruled: 'Although the named [woman one] and [woman two], both in the statements given before the criminal investigation bodies, as witnesses, and through the authenticated statements given before the notary and submitted by the defense to the case file, denied any form of exploitation on the part of the four defendants, the collegial panel of rights and freedoms appreciates that these statements do not reflect reality.
'It is known that, in the case of the 'lover boy' or 'by falling in love' recruitment method, the victims of human trafficking do not always recognize the fact that they were enslaved and exploited and do not cooperate with the judicial bodies, attesting to the idea that these activities were carried out voluntarily.'
It does not matter if consent was obtained through "the lover boy recruitment method", whatever that means. Consent is consent. And being a "lover boy" is not a crime.
Prosecutors claim the brothers lured women into the studio where they were sexually exploited through 'acts of physical violence and mental coercion (through intimidation, constant supervision, control and invocation of alleged debts)', and made to produce and share pornographic material.
It's legal to be a pimp as long as it's for a cam whore, not a regular whore. Where is the evidence of this violence and coercion? There is none. The girls are openly saying "no, we weren't victims, we consented" and the Court is saying "no, he just fooled you into liking him, trust me, he's a bad guy!"
This is the one to be concerned about. Countries like England (and apparently Romania) already have laws about this. Not laying a hand on someone isn't a defense when they can say that you abused them through manipulation. Look for scummy politicians to start with this shit in the US soon.
Clown world assholes:
Women are equal to men
Also these assholes:
Women are so weak and stupid that men can control them like children or retarded puppets simply by being smarter than them and using their sinister man-power of mental control and coercion
It does not matter if consent was obtained through "the lover boy recruitment method", whatever that means. Consent is consent. And being a "lover boy" is not a crime.
In Romania, being a pick-up artist makes you a sex trafficker apparently.
It's one thing if he started to groom them when they were teens, but using some PUA to get a girl to fall for you and be willing to be a camwhore for you isn't a crime unless they use threats to get you to keep doing it.
If you're a woman, how can you not be offended by this?
Basically anything is a crime so long as corrupt officials are willing to abuse their power.
Welcome to why the United States has a Constitutional right to jury trial. It's exactly for this reason. Unfortunately that right has been greatly eroded over time.
If it was not clear already that this case is a rigged hit on Tate ordered by higher ups in the Romanian government, it should be crystal clear now.
It does not matter if consent was obtained through "the lover boy recruitment method", whatever that means. Consent is consent. And being a "lover boy" is not a crime.
It's legal to be a pimp as long as it's for a cam whore, not a regular whore. Where is the evidence of this violence and coercion? There is none. The girls are openly saying "no, we weren't victims, we consented" and the Court is saying "no, he just fooled you into liking him, trust me, he's a bad guy!"
uh huh.
This is about what I'd expect from Romania. When I think shining examples of justice, I don't think of the former Soviet block
It's kind of like Ukraine in that way. You just assume everyone is corrupt.
This is the one to be concerned about. Countries like England (and apparently Romania) already have laws about this. Not laying a hand on someone isn't a defense when they can say that you abused them through manipulation. Look for scummy politicians to start with this shit in the US soon.
Clown world assholes:
Also these assholes:
In Romania, being a pick-up artist makes you a sex trafficker apparently.
It's one thing if he started to groom them when they were teens, but using some PUA to get a girl to fall for you and be willing to be a camwhore for you isn't a crime unless they use threats to get you to keep doing it.
If you're a woman, how can you not be offended by this?
Basically anything is a crime so long as corrupt officials are willing to abuse their power.
Welcome to why the United States has a Constitutional right to jury trial. It's exactly for this reason. Unfortunately that right has been greatly eroded over time.
They've resorted to the ridiculous allegation they claimed Jordan Peterson made when he said "Enforced Monogamy".
If you promise a woman a job and husband, and you don't get it, that's a crime. The state is required to make that man her husband.