Isn't there some kind of thing that's meant to prevent this? Similar to the Brady Doctrine but regarding the process meant to be not used to harm someone in exactly the way this seems to be going down here?
I could have sworn there was something but I can't for the life of my remember what it was called and I keep looping back to the Brady Doctrine in name despite that not being it.
Speedy trial is completely gone. It's not even, like, particular to Federal cases or famous people or whatever. People in general aren't going to trial for years after they are charged, and if they are denied bond, that's it.
Another aspect of this is people who are out on bond are committing crimes. However, instead of beating ourselves up over who gets bond, why can't we just quickly put people on trial? Whatever funds it takes to make that happen seems in the interest of society.
And America is meant to not copy the English system for a speedy trial
If they somehow turn out to be innocent then all lawyers and judges of this state should lose their licences.
Isn't there some kind of thing that's meant to prevent this? Similar to the Brady Doctrine but regarding the process meant to be not used to harm someone in exactly the way this seems to be going down here?
I could have sworn there was something but I can't for the life of my remember what it was called and I keep looping back to the Brady Doctrine in name despite that not being it.
They're ignoring all the meth that was found
Speedy trial is completely gone. It's not even, like, particular to Federal cases or famous people or whatever. People in general aren't going to trial for years after they are charged, and if they are denied bond, that's it.
Another aspect of this is people who are out on bond are committing crimes. However, instead of beating ourselves up over who gets bond, why can't we just quickly put people on trial? Whatever funds it takes to make that happen seems in the interest of society.