I should also note that this abuser issue is not exclusive to vaccines; there are many harrowing examples of severe injuries occurring within trials for other pharmaceuticals such as SSRIs (which, as was the case with HPV vaccine, harmful “placebos,” were almost certainly utilized deliberately to make the drug under study look better at the patient's expense)
…In 2015, everything changed. She read online that the Gardasil clinical trials had used an aluminum solution as the control, not saline, as she had been told. Sesilje worked in clinical research, so she knew that this should not have been permissible. She was certain that she had been told that the control was saline—it was even printed in the brochure she received years ago.
She was determined to research this, if only to prove the online information wrong. She expected to confirm that the placebo was “saltvand”—Danish for “saline.” Instead, she found that there was no saline placebo group at all. What she had read online was correct: the control contained aluminum. Her heart sank. She knew what this meant: because the vaccine also had the same solution as the control, [she had] received [a total of] six injections containing aluminum, three as the “placebo” and later three as the vaccine.
Merck could justify them by noting that the Gardasil and control groups had virtually the same results. Merck and the FDA apparently interpreted these similar data as support for safety rather than as signals for alarm.
No, no, surely the pharma corps would never do this! Only a kook would accuse them of such massive lies...! /s
I’m looking forward to seeing the LOLberts and chamber of commerce Republicans saying that this is just the free market in action and that the invisible hand will surely guide the market towards safer products instead of a race to the bottom where lying, corruption and fraud are incentivized.
People would never pay taxes if it was purely on the honor system. But the voluntary reporting that everyone does is verified by auditors and they’re backed up by people with badges and guns.
In this case, clinical trials need to be audited to verify that adverse reactions are properly reported and if people are caught lying, the CEOs need to go to prison.
I’m looking forward to seeing the LOLberts and chamber of commerce Republicans saying that this is just the free market in action and that the invisible hand will surely guide the market towards safer products instead of a race to the bottom where lying, corruption and fraud are incentivized.
A big first step to getting to that place would be to revoke the protection from liability that the vaccine manufacturer's have. As is, though, with the government shielding them from any fallout from their rushed, experimental treatments they'll just keep doing what they're doing, and the FDA (which is incestuously connected with all of the big pharma companies) will just keep telling people to get the jabs.
The fake placebos mention is very interesting. The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated, or at least was debated before wrong think could cost you your job. So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo, and does Malone point to any justification offered by Pharma? I know what he's implying.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding. For every advance in knowledge two questions arise, and I think our ability to tinker has far exceeded our mechanistic understanding.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
Congratulations, you just accurately described how difficult it is to modify genomic data. Such as via MRNA.
All it takes is a single pair swap to go wrong and you can cause an absolute cascade of failures. And the more confusing part of it, is that swapping out that very same pair in a different person, can lead to a different result.
Honestly DNA is a lot like a form of extremely advanced computer code. However unlike computer code, which you can generally just access via a terminal, you have to go through so many hoops to be able to tweak DNA in general, that doing so accurately and consistently is extremely difficult.
The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated
Yeah, that was one thing that kind of stood out to me too -- it seems that their data shows that, in addition to the 'vaccines' being dangerous, maybe the delivery solutions themselves are also dangerous.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding.
I had this exact discussion with a friend of mine who received his PhD in Microbiology from Notre Dame. As a software dev, I know how difficult it is to put together a functioning system even when all of the pieces are deterministic and specifically designed -- by humans -- to work with each other.
I'll believe that these wanna-be-organic-programmers know what they're doing when they can design a brand new organism from scratch, give it the exact life cycle that they want, get it to reproduce on its own, and get its offspring to reproduce on their own. I'll believe that they know how mammals work when they can design their own mammal out of ACTG molecules -- not a bunch of frankensteined chunks spliced together.
So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo,
Because they can say that they're solely testing the safety of the vaccine itself by comparing the delta of aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant. And then they can declare victory when the safety delta is small. When in reality, a comparison between saline versus aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant would probably show a much higher injury differential when comparing saline against either of the other options.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity.
Dr. Weinstein, who is a biologist by trade, brings up the idea that biology is the study of complex systems all the time on his podcast.
This was a good read. Thank you for sharing.
If by "good read" you mean "enraging, revenge-murder-spree-inspiring," I'd agree with you.
No, no, surely the pharma corps would never do this! Only a kook would accuse them of such massive lies...! /s
I’m looking forward to seeing the LOLberts and chamber of commerce Republicans saying that this is just the free market in action and that the invisible hand will surely guide the market towards safer products instead of a race to the bottom where lying, corruption and fraud are incentivized.
People would never pay taxes if it was purely on the honor system. But the voluntary reporting that everyone does is verified by auditors and they’re backed up by people with badges and guns.
In this case, clinical trials need to be audited to verify that adverse reactions are properly reported and if people are caught lying, the CEOs need to go to prison.
A big first step to getting to that place would be to revoke the protection from liability that the vaccine manufacturer's have. As is, though, with the government shielding them from any fallout from their rushed, experimental treatments they'll just keep doing what they're doing, and the FDA (which is incestuously connected with all of the big pharma companies) will just keep telling people to get the jabs.
The fake placebos mention is very interesting. The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated, or at least was debated before wrong think could cost you your job. So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo, and does Malone point to any justification offered by Pharma? I know what he's implying.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding. For every advance in knowledge two questions arise, and I think our ability to tinker has far exceeded our mechanistic understanding.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
Congratulations, you just accurately described how difficult it is to modify genomic data. Such as via MRNA.
All it takes is a single pair swap to go wrong and you can cause an absolute cascade of failures. And the more confusing part of it, is that swapping out that very same pair in a different person, can lead to a different result.
Honestly DNA is a lot like a form of extremely advanced computer code. However unlike computer code, which you can generally just access via a terminal, you have to go through so many hoops to be able to tweak DNA in general, that doing so accurately and consistently is extremely difficult.
Yeah, that was one thing that kind of stood out to me too -- it seems that their data shows that, in addition to the 'vaccines' being dangerous, maybe the delivery solutions themselves are also dangerous.
I had this exact discussion with a friend of mine who received his PhD in Microbiology from Notre Dame. As a software dev, I know how difficult it is to put together a functioning system even when all of the pieces are deterministic and specifically designed -- by humans -- to work with each other.
I'll believe that these wanna-be-organic-programmers know what they're doing when they can design a brand new organism from scratch, give it the exact life cycle that they want, get it to reproduce on its own, and get its offspring to reproduce on their own. I'll believe that they know how mammals work when they can design their own mammal out of ACTG molecules -- not a bunch of frankensteined chunks spliced together.
Because they can say that they're solely testing the safety of the vaccine itself by comparing the delta of aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant. And then they can declare victory when the safety delta is small. When in reality, a comparison between saline versus aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant would probably show a much higher injury differential when comparing saline against either of the other options.
Dr. Weinstein, who is a biologist by trade, brings up the idea that biology is the study of complex systems all the time on his podcast.