His name is just Harry, not "Prince Harry"
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Huh? What a bizarre take. Healthy families have multiple generations of people working together to raise the kids. It's so helpful to have an extended family around to help out. Renouncing them to run off with just your wife and kids sounds like making things artificially harder for yourself for no good reason.
Do you actually think the Royal family is good? Do you think your parents are going to live forever? Do you think a family home has more then 8 bedrooms?
Reminder, I'm replying to someone who thinks getting married, relinquishing a corrupt monarchy and having children, is "Getting some tail".
So, your interjections on the possibility of a healthy generational family isn't really relevant here is it? Nor are you're assumption of my beliefs.
While I disagree with a lot of what you said, I'm not going to get into an argument about the other points, I was just mystified with the way that you framed getting married as 'Everyone renounces their family for their new life with their wives and kids.'
'Renounce' implies abandonment, rejection, formally declaring oneself as separate from. I don't think 'everyone' does this when they get married, In fact I think it's a very unhealthy thing to do.
You could argue that a man owes more allegiance to his wife than the rest of his family after he is married, but 'renouncing' them? Why?
You can see why I am confused by your statement, context of the royals aside.
It's important to note that we are not actually having a conversation. Text is interpreted differently to spoken word in the brain. All of your assumptions are things you have read into the text. Text that was not meant for you.
On the contrary. I don't think you are confused at all.