I knew once I saw Andrew Torba's name up there that it was gonna be that kind of fear mongering.

they only made photos and videos with real children in them illegal, computer-generated imagery of children, no matter how sexual, is not illegal in the eyes of the law

Nobody tell him that the Supreme Court also said this back in like 1996, and it took Congress passing additional laws that can best be described as "as many loopholes as possible to avoid the SCOTUS but allow us to define it to be whatever we want" to circumvent it.

Its always hilarious how the type to pearl clutch over this have done less than zero research into the legality and history of that legality. They simply have the same response as a Leftist does, "if I don't like it, it shouldn't be legal! To hell with any consequences or possible misuse of these laws!!"