From what I've seen lately, you might as well have wrote "the Kering Foundation" instead of making up a name.
I find it interesting that you move from one boogeyman to another which you paint as all-powerful when you get fixated on it.
Did you hear about the woman who claimed to be a grooming gang victim but was actually hitting herself with a weapon to make it look like it?
Oh wow! Did you hear about the man who claimed to be a Holocaust victim but actually lived in Switzerland during the war? Don't tell the Stormfags that you would accept that as definitive proof that the Holocaust is a hoax.
I mean, it's not the most ridiculous idea.
Just for fun: do you think your criteria for what are ridiculous ideas are reasonable and/or shared by people?
A female mass shooter targeting men shot at a group containing girls and every single feminist shill jumped on that to say that it wasn't targeting men.
I know a feminist mass shooter who targeted men. Omar Mateen.
Still, I think even they would draw the line at pushing children under a train. Maybe. Hopefully.
I don't. It's called new information. You can't stick to the same things when you find new, more useful information.
Believing a historical event with tons of evidence behind it is not the same as believing a bunch of lying murder fantasists who literally have it in their ideology to avoid truth.
I find it interesting that you move from one boogeyman to another which you paint as all-powerful when you get fixated on it.
Oh wow! Did you hear about the man who claimed to be a Holocaust victim but actually lived in Switzerland during the war? Don't tell the Stormfags that you would accept that as definitive proof that the Holocaust is a hoax.
Just for fun: do you think your criteria for what are ridiculous ideas are reasonable and/or shared by people?
I know a feminist mass shooter who targeted men. Omar Mateen.
Why?
I don't. It's called new information. You can't stick to the same things when you find new, more useful information.
Believing a historical event with tons of evidence behind it is not the same as believing a bunch of lying murder fantasists who literally have it in their ideology to avoid truth.
Depends on the topic.
I don't get it.