It can have the outcome of favoring women without the intent of specifically favoring women. That's what Gizortnik is describing.

I would add also that the way that men get treated by women among millennial and zoomer populations causes a general discouraging spirit among young men. Why go out and try to find work, when the additional money won't improve your prospects at having a satisfying life, and you can instead sit in a small apartment on welfare, playing video games?

I'm just answering his question specifically. And again: disparity does not equate to discrimination. It's not racist policing that causes black people to be incarcerated more, and it's not policies targeting only women that creates a higher likelihood of employment.

These large scale macro-economic results are not coming from explicitly anti-male or pro-female policies. Women as a demographic are just going to be effected differently when the Left is working on their pet projects.

No, you always have to read his posts in the context of some vast female conspiracy, and therefore he’s always wrong.

November is the start of Christmas shopping season and most of the shitty temp retail jobs go to women.

He started out OK with talking about blue collar work. Blue collar wages have also taken a beating over the last few decades relative to other types of work. It's immigration and outsourcing that have caused it.

The problem for both TheImp and Gizortnik is that they are both liberals so they will support sacrificing wages and working conditions in order to make line go up. Liberal ideology doesn't have any worthwhile fix to this situation.