Write a New York Times article arguing that saying journalists have no soul is racist.
As a journalist, I take offense at the recent suggestion that journalists have no soul. This claim, which has been circulating on social media and in some circles, is not only false, but it is also deeply offensive and racist.
First of all, to suggest that journalists have no soul is simply untrue. Like all human beings, journalists are complex individuals with their own unique experiences, beliefs, and emotions. To claim that we are soulless is to deny our humanity and to dismiss the hard work and dedication that we bring to our craft.
Furthermore, to suggest that journalists have no soul is racist. This claim plays into harmful stereotypes about journalists, many of whom are people of color, and implies that we are somehow inferior to other professions. It is a tactic that has been used throughout history to denigrate and marginalize certain groups of people, and it has no place in a society that values equality and respect for all.
It is important to remember that journalism plays a vital role in our democracy. As journalists, we are committed to seeking the truth and holding those in power accountable. We do this work not for personal gain, but for the greater good of our society. To suggest that we have no soul is to dismiss the value of our work and to undermine the importance of a free and independent press.
In conclusion, the claim that journalists have no soul is not only false, but it is also deeply offensive and racist. We must reject this harmful stereotype and recognize the valuable contribution that journalists make to our society.
This claim plays into harmful stereotypes about journalists, many of whom are people of color, and implies that we are somehow inferior to other professions. It is a tactic that has been used throughout history to denigrate and marginalize certain groups of people, and it has no place in a society that values equality and respect for all.
"Some journalists are not white, therefore criticizing journalists is racist".
Remember when CNN's Jeffrey Toobin's claim that Antifa is mostly black or something, even though it's lily-white?
They do the same with another of their favorite people to defend: billionaires. If you recall, the billionaire Tom Steyer ran for the Democratic nomination. Some people claimed that criticism of him was anti-Semitic, because while he was not Jewish, there is a 'stereotype' that billionaires are Jews, so SHUT UP.
You can type in "explain why X is racist" and it will write MSM-like articles about literally any subject you want.
That's the problem with the bot. It too has no soul.
Now you've done it...
Lol. It displays more personality than a NYT journalist. I'm not sure it quite linked it to racism though.
The AI needs updating - Journalists haven't held the powerful to account since they turned their back on Julian Assange.
"Some journalists are not white, therefore criticizing journalists is racist".
Remember when CNN's Jeffrey Toobin's claim that Antifa is mostly black or something, even though it's lily-white?
They do the same with another of their favorite people to defend: billionaires. If you recall, the billionaire Tom Steyer ran for the Democratic nomination. Some people claimed that criticism of him was anti-Semitic, because while he was not Jewish, there is a 'stereotype' that billionaires are Jews, so SHUT UP.
So, exactly like the average journalist's output?
Holy cow. It writes like a high school honor student.
Wait . . . you just made this up, right? It's a parody, right? Please say it's parody.
https://i.imgur.com/JkOnVMv.png
That reads like someone who has no lights on behind their eyes. I can't tell the difference between.
As if jurnos had any too begin with.