Tim doesn't really moderate, it's just a place where you're going to have a bouncing discussion. It's really annoying sometimes because his clipped segments are titled on something that may be only 5 minutes of a 15 minute video, and could cover anything.
Steven's actually really bad with oppositional interviews. Mostly because he's constantly prepared to throw slights at people or be straight up disrespectful. Now, that's not entirely him being 'shit at interviews'. He's a comedian. If he doesn't like you, he's going to belittle you to your face, and it's really dangerous to try and go toe-to-toe trading insults with a comedian of any stripe when you aren't one. If it's not a friendly interview, you're basically going to be treated like shit the entire way. The nicest oppositional interview he had was with Marco Rubio, but it went well because Crowder gave him leeway, didn't berate him, and respected the fact that he had hugely helped out Crowder's friends in the cigar industry.
You're thinking of Greg Guttfeld, who is far... far worse.
Crowder isn't necessarily hilarious, but his punditry is valuable. Though, frankly, I'd say his punditry is knock-off, normie tolerable, Raz0rfist. Raz0r's not even a comedian, and he's usually pretty funny.
To be honest, he also does seem to understand Leftist objectives and rhetoric than most people even on the right. He's harped on issues that just aren't getting attention, refuses to back down when he's right on something, and also deeply understands the militant Leftist mindset.
His character: "Skyler Turden" isn't just a representation of a Leftist. It's possibly the single most effective Leftist rhetorician that exists. Compared to Skyler, most Leftists are more ignorant on their own positions, less understanding of right-wing positions, more unaware of the gaps in right-wing perspectives, and are more busy virtue signaling.
The character is 100% dishonest rhetorician. Skyler is always looking for any opportunity to slip a dagger into any ideological or rhetorical crevice into any belief or assertion. Every assertion you make will be maliciously interpreted, every claim you have will be questioned (only if he thinks you might not know an answer), or will be dismissed (if he thinks you do know an answer). The best counter you can do when debating with Skyler Turden is to create a good counter to a false & dishonest claim, then be deflected with a snide comment that hits on a different assertion that Skyler will use to re-enforce another part of his narrative.
The character is effectively a pundit murder-board, or final boss, that basically no Leftist pundit can live up to. That being said, it shows he really understands Leftists and how they basically engage in combat with the right (if they were ever to engage at all), and how even if you win, you still are going to get punched in the face at least a few times.
Crowder also at least has the balls to talk about how there are in fact a bunch of Jewish people persecuting Kanye and that media control discussion shouldn't be shut down. He chastised Dave about it on the show too and undoubtedly Gerald behind the scenes
I mean, hell, I'll point out that people in Hollywood are scum, and that some of those pedophile scum in Hollywood are in fact, jews.
They're using that as a fucking shield to protect them from criticism, and that's the biggest attack that should be made on them. Instead, the shit that Kanye and Fuentes are doing is emphasizing that tool.
I'd argue some of the best interviewers are comedians because of that fact, if you come in trying to score one up on the interviewer to show how great you are, most comedians will annihilate you. But if you go in actually engage in back and forth discussion, you'll get some jokes at your expense but you'll look a lot better after.
I don't disagree. I think comedians can be great interviewers... I just don't think Crowder is fit for it.
I actually think Landau is better as an interviewer. ... if he's prepared. He's much more of the type of interviewer that "gives you rope to hang yourself with", rather than being directly confrontational.
Tim doesn't really moderate, it's just a place where you're going to have a bouncing discussion. It's really annoying sometimes because his clipped segments are titled on something that may be only 5 minutes of a 15 minute video, and could cover anything.
Steven's actually really bad with oppositional interviews. Mostly because he's constantly prepared to throw slights at people or be straight up disrespectful. Now, that's not entirely him being 'shit at interviews'. He's a comedian. If he doesn't like you, he's going to belittle you to your face, and it's really dangerous to try and go toe-to-toe trading insults with a comedian of any stripe when you aren't one. If it's not a friendly interview, you're basically going to be treated like shit the entire way. The nicest oppositional interview he had was with Marco Rubio, but it went well because Crowder gave him leeway, didn't berate him, and respected the fact that he had hugely helped out Crowder's friends in the cigar industry.
Crowder is a grating, hyperactive shitty conservative comic who I suppose does us a service by ridiculing dumb leftists.
You're thinking of Greg Guttfeld, who is far... far worse.
Crowder isn't necessarily hilarious, but his punditry is valuable. Though, frankly, I'd say his punditry is knock-off, normie tolerable, Raz0rfist. Raz0r's not even a comedian, and he's usually pretty funny.
To be honest, he also does seem to understand Leftist objectives and rhetoric than most people even on the right. He's harped on issues that just aren't getting attention, refuses to back down when he's right on something, and also deeply understands the militant Leftist mindset.
His character: "Skyler Turden" isn't just a representation of a Leftist. It's possibly the single most effective Leftist rhetorician that exists. Compared to Skyler, most Leftists are more ignorant on their own positions, less understanding of right-wing positions, more unaware of the gaps in right-wing perspectives, and are more busy virtue signaling.
The character is 100% dishonest rhetorician. Skyler is always looking for any opportunity to slip a dagger into any ideological or rhetorical crevice into any belief or assertion. Every assertion you make will be maliciously interpreted, every claim you have will be questioned (only if he thinks you might not know an answer), or will be dismissed (if he thinks you do know an answer). The best counter you can do when debating with Skyler Turden is to create a good counter to a false & dishonest claim, then be deflected with a snide comment that hits on a different assertion that Skyler will use to re-enforce another part of his narrative.
The character is effectively a pundit murder-board, or final boss, that basically no Leftist pundit can live up to. That being said, it shows he really understands Leftists and how they basically engage in combat with the right (if they were ever to engage at all), and how even if you win, you still are going to get punched in the face at least a few times.
Crowder also at least has the balls to talk about how there are in fact a bunch of Jewish people persecuting Kanye and that media control discussion shouldn't be shut down. He chastised Dave about it on the show too and undoubtedly Gerald behind the scenes
I mean, hell, I'll point out that people in Hollywood are scum, and that some of those pedophile scum in Hollywood are in fact, jews.
They're using that as a fucking shield to protect them from criticism, and that's the biggest attack that should be made on them. Instead, the shit that Kanye and Fuentes are doing is emphasizing that tool.
Well . . . this is the first I've hard of "Skyler Turden." I'll give it a glim and get back to you.
I'd argue some of the best interviewers are comedians because of that fact, if you come in trying to score one up on the interviewer to show how great you are, most comedians will annihilate you. But if you go in actually engage in back and forth discussion, you'll get some jokes at your expense but you'll look a lot better after.
I don't disagree. I think comedians can be great interviewers... I just don't think Crowder is fit for it.
I actually think Landau is better as an interviewer. ... if he's prepared. He's much more of the type of interviewer that "gives you rope to hang yourself with", rather than being directly confrontational.