The act of covering the leg increases the lascivious nature of the leg; clothing could hide anything, and nothing is more attractive than the unknown. In that regard, hose or thigh highs, which hint at the unknown but deny its certainty, are clearly superior. That stated, context is important: Should the act of hiding seem out of place, so too is the clothing. A woman in a swimsuit, generally speaking, looks better highlighting the unknowns upon her upper and lower torso, and not diverting the attention to more unknowns below, for that often spawns more questions than hopes and dreams.
And yes, I know Strike Witches did that. But I'm here to make a bold stance that Strike Witches made poor fashion choices, despite their best efforts at making a truly cultured show.
"Tits are life, ass is hometown." - Kenichiro Takaki
A man of culture, but want to try hard mode?
Thigh highs, stockings, knee socks or bare?
Trick question. Crew socks. Big tiddie tomboy girlfriend would never wear anything else. Maybe ankle socks.
True but what about her divorced milf mom in stockings? Lol
The act of covering the leg increases the lascivious nature of the leg; clothing could hide anything, and nothing is more attractive than the unknown. In that regard, hose or thigh highs, which hint at the unknown but deny its certainty, are clearly superior. That stated, context is important: Should the act of hiding seem out of place, so too is the clothing. A woman in a swimsuit, generally speaking, looks better highlighting the unknowns upon her upper and lower torso, and not diverting the attention to more unknowns below, for that often spawns more questions than hopes and dreams.
And yes, I know Strike Witches did that. But I'm here to make a bold stance that Strike Witches made poor fashion choices, despite their best efforts at making a truly cultured show.
Rises a fine glass of whiskey to such a cultured opinion
The correct answer is yes.