Regardless of whether that's true or not, America never fought Japan for humanitarian reasons as i said above. You can tell by what they did afterwards (removing the anti commie laws that Japan had and releasing all the commie prisoners) and then invading the Middle East , and keeping the Middle East in a state of perpetual war for decades on end probably with a ton of atrocities happening that you will never hear about
Being a nation of medivalists is better than being a nation controlled by globalist communists and Rothschild bankers. Japan was one of the few countries that rejected the League of Nations which was the equivalent of the United Nations at the time. Were they ruthless? Maybe so, but the reasons America fought against Japan was for the globalist bankers who were losing control in that part of the world it was never about humanitarianism, that was proven by how America has been invading countries in the Middle East for the Rothschilds ever since. Keeping some in the state of perpetual war for decades on end. Where is the care for humanitarianism in that?
I'm not telling you to like imperial Japan I'm only saying the situation wasn't black and white.
They dissected American POW's alive, for fun.
We don't need to listen to the commies to see how what a bunch of war crime loving savages they were.
Regardless of whether that's true or not, America never fought Japan for humanitarian reasons as i said above. You can tell by what they did afterwards (removing the anti commie laws that Japan had and releasing all the commie prisoners) and then invading the Middle East , and keeping the Middle East in a state of perpetual war for decades on end probably with a ton of atrocities happening that you will never hear about
And? Doesn't change the fact that imperial japan was a nation of medievalists.
Being a nation of medivalists is better than being a nation controlled by globalist communists and Rothschild bankers. Japan was one of the few countries that rejected the League of Nations which was the equivalent of the United Nations at the time. Were they ruthless? Maybe so, but the reasons America fought against Japan was for the globalist bankers who were losing control in that part of the world it was never about humanitarianism, that was proven by how America has been invading countries in the Middle East for the Rothschilds ever since. Keeping some in the state of perpetual war for decades on end. Where is the care for humanitarianism in that?
I'm not telling you to like imperial Japan I'm only saying the situation wasn't black and white.