Because I own a copy of Mien Kampf. The idea that Hitler was for property rights and individualism is one of the single most retarded things I've ever seen.
By the way... Germans knew exactly what Socialism meant when they elected KARL MARX'S FUCKING POLITICAL PARTY into power and created the Wiermar Republic.
Look. Why are you Nazis this fucking stupid. If you're gonna be a Nazi, stop trying to hide shit. Just fucking tell the truth: you want Nationalist Socialism so the state can enact Racial Justice. You're Leftists, stop lying.
we think every race has a right to their self-governed homeland and that jews are a force of evil against that, lefties think every race has a right to White homelands and that it should all be orchestrated from the great ethnostate of israel
definitely the same... fuck me is it hard to keep going when the people you fight for are this daft.
More than that, every racialist is inevitably a race traitor. You don't fight for white people either. You never had, and you never will. You fight for what you imagine white people should be. Then you attack any white person who dissents from your personal vision. Always have, always will. It is utterly inevitable that you would line most white people up against a wall and shoot them because they had too many black friends or too many "jewish traits" which is whatever you say it is.
You don't like the history of the people you claim to support, you only want to enact your vision, and in so doing you will destroy their culture, their history, their family connections, their communities, and their language, and you will call it "unity". When they object to the destruction of their communities, you will attack them as counter-revolutionaries.
literal insanity you're spewing here. maybe you're thinking of the neo-nazis beating each other up over crack in prison race warfare, those might act like that. otherwise it's lies upon lies, though you might not be lying and might actually just believe this random shit you've posted.
No. Those people actually support more racial loyalty than anyone who classifies themselves as a white nationalist, hilariously. They will basically take any white person of any stripe.
You won't.
Now, I grant you: I wouldn't want to support white Communists either. But the thing is, I know you won't support a white moderate let alone a Communist, and you'll put a bullet in both for not acquiescing to your perception of white people should be. You'll do the same shit that every identitarian group does: claim that anyone who dissents from you within your protected group is a traitor, or is deceived by false consciousness. It happens 100% of the time.
Okay. Let me pose these questions to you, and I'll preface it by saying that I've posed them to dozens of high-end engineers, and even the 75% that realized what game I was playing never had an answer.
So: According to canon, there was a place (Krema 3) in Auschwitz, where "2000" jews were gassed/incinerated -- the real number is probably 1250, but hey, jews are allowed all kinds of leeway. Let's say 2000, and then scale down as needed. The floor-plans of the rooms are readily available.
This brings up two questions:
There was only one door to the room. So, as jews were being shoved into the room, their ability to resist further shovings was being augmented. After about 100 jews were in the room, they would easily be able to resist any more jews being shoved in, because any force applied could only pass through the width of one door. (you'll have to think a bit about this, but eventually it's very obvious)
Ah yes -- guns! But any gunshot would lead to mass panic, and, as there were no turrets (in the enclosed Krema spaces), there would be no way to stop the mass panic/trampling that would obviously occur.
Pre-suppose that 2000 (1250) jews just walked passively into a room, and lined up passively to be killed. Okay, as the gas starts to enter the room, the people at the front would, naturally, push toward the door. Then, as they died, they would tumble in random positions, and then fall in an entangled morass. As such, the extraction of the dead would require chainsaws etc. Something not evidenced in any eye-witness testimony.
Okay: so keep in mind that there is no 'bamboozle' here. This is all simply basic engineering. If I were wrong, literal children could contradict me, and I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
Can you, Gizortnik, with your obvious 145+ IQ tell me my errors? Or do you just ignore this?
Remember: if the holocaust could not have happened... then it didn't.
Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
So, as jews were being shoved into the room, their ability to resist further shoving
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Then, as they died, they would tumble in random positions, and then fall in an entangled morass. As such, the extraction of the dead would require chainsaws etc.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
You know how I know that quote is bullshit?
Because I own a copy of Mien Kampf. The idea that Hitler was for property rights and individualism is one of the single most retarded things I've ever seen.
By the way... Germans knew exactly what Socialism meant when they elected KARL MARX'S FUCKING POLITICAL PARTY into power and created the Wiermar Republic.
Look. Why are you Nazis this fucking stupid. If you're gonna be a Nazi, stop trying to hide shit. Just fucking tell the truth: you want Nationalist Socialism so the state can enact Racial Justice. You're Leftists, stop lying.
we think every race has a right to their self-governed homeland and that jews are a force of evil against that, lefties think every race has a right to White homelands and that it should all be orchestrated from the great ethnostate of israel
definitely the same... fuck me is it hard to keep going when the people you fight for are this daft.
if you are indeed my people.
I'm an American. You've never fought for me.
More than that, every racialist is inevitably a race traitor. You don't fight for white people either. You never had, and you never will. You fight for what you imagine white people should be. Then you attack any white person who dissents from your personal vision. Always have, always will. It is utterly inevitable that you would line most white people up against a wall and shoot them because they had too many black friends or too many "jewish traits" which is whatever you say it is.
You don't like the history of the people you claim to support, you only want to enact your vision, and in so doing you will destroy their culture, their history, their family connections, their communities, and their language, and you will call it "unity". When they object to the destruction of their communities, you will attack them as counter-revolutionaries.
You never, ever, do anything else.
literal insanity you're spewing here. maybe you're thinking of the neo-nazis beating each other up over crack in prison race warfare, those might act like that. otherwise it's lies upon lies, though you might not be lying and might actually just believe this random shit you've posted.
No. Those people actually support more racial loyalty than anyone who classifies themselves as a white nationalist, hilariously. They will basically take any white person of any stripe.
You won't.
Now, I grant you: I wouldn't want to support white Communists either. But the thing is, I know you won't support a white moderate let alone a Communist, and you'll put a bullet in both for not acquiescing to your perception of white people should be. You'll do the same shit that every identitarian group does: claim that anyone who dissents from you within your protected group is a traitor, or is deceived by false consciousness. It happens 100% of the time.
This is so unhinged!
All I have to do is look at the evidence, and the shit that Hitler said and did.
Ah, evidence.
Okay. Let me pose these questions to you, and I'll preface it by saying that I've posed them to dozens of high-end engineers, and even the 75% that realized what game I was playing never had an answer.
So: According to canon, there was a place (Krema 3) in Auschwitz, where "2000" jews were gassed/incinerated -- the real number is probably 1250, but hey, jews are allowed all kinds of leeway. Let's say 2000, and then scale down as needed. The floor-plans of the rooms are readily available.
This brings up two questions:
Ah yes -- guns! But any gunshot would lead to mass panic, and, as there were no turrets (in the enclosed Krema spaces), there would be no way to stop the mass panic/trampling that would obviously occur.
Okay: so keep in mind that there is no 'bamboozle' here. This is all simply basic engineering. If I were wrong, literal children could contradict me, and I would, of course, be man enough to admit my errors.
Can you, Gizortnik, with your obvious 145+ IQ tell me my errors? Or do you just ignore this?
Remember: if the holocaust could not have happened... then it didn't.
Sincerely, Danger Dog
Why did you attempt to write a letter?
Anyways, why would I assume a holocaust denier would care to understand the architecture of a building since the old "wooden door" thing is a trope among your people.
Oh wow, you're making an even worse argument than I thought.
As with many massacres and executions, the individuals themselves are normally lied to, and are already being herded like cattle. You might as well ask why I believe prisons exists since all prisoners can do exactly the same thing. I'm not sure why you don't believe in institutionalization, crowd control, or group think.
Again, these are criticisms that are divorced from reality. This has never been true. This isn't true in massacres, gas attacks, fires, mass graves, or human crushes. This did not happen at The Station Nightclub Fire, this did not happen in Al-Aimmah Bridge stampeded, the Love Parade Crush, or in the trenches of WW1. I can't think of such a situation happening even in instances of mass involuntary gas poisoning (like Carbon Monoxide, or Carbon Dioxide releases rooms of certain buildings for numerous reasons). The thing you think should happen, doesn't.
In all of those cases, doors are typically involved, and normally wooden and glass doors impose such a barrier that as people try to crush their way through, they get stuck in the choke point and die. The gas chambers themselves would have been hermetically sealed as to not to kill the executioners, making the passageways utterly impenetrable for an unarmed mob. If anything, people tend to just stack on top of each other in such disasters.
The National Socialists themselves indicated that the usage of gas trucks by the execution units took quite a severe mental and physical strain on the troops themselves, as personally dragging corpses around all day is a grueling process. This is why the concept of the Sonder-Kommando units of involuntary conscripted prisoners was invented. These people were to be executed within a few weeks (later than many others), but would do most of the back-breaking labor of moving bodies.
There's also plenty of evidence that even in the mass graves themselves, there was no such "entangled morass". Even in the film Night And Fog {around the 27 minute mark}, you can see allied troops using bulldozers to bulldoze bodies into graves without their being an "entangled morass".
It is simply not a thing. You just don't know what you're talking about.
You may do so, but you'd be the first.