Because it is good for Jews. If tradtionalist Christians fall into the trap of thinking it is bad and ban it in their own countries, it will only be good for Jews.
Artificial wombs will lead the path forward back to patriarchal family structure by taking control away from women, who are increasingly brainwashed by Feminism.
No one here is suggesting that they be trusted at all. Hell, I openly advocate forcing most of them to confirm/behave and making public examples of the rest.
Artificial wombs will lead the path forward back to patriarchal family structure by taking control away from women, who are increasingly brainwashed by Feminism.
Wait, what? This probably wins the award for most insane post ever. Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't), even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be), how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?
Oh, and the primary users of these artificial wombs? Probably 40-50 year old Karens who, upon realizing their actual wombs dried up (or who got them wrecked by having a pile of abortions) go to sperm bank (or pay some 20 year old simp for some of his sperm) and then use the artificial wombs to have the kid(s) their biological clocks are demanding they have. I'm sure a whole generation of kids raised that way will only help society!
Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't)
That is a fair criticism, and we will have to see what happens when artificial wombs hit the market. It will likely only be the rich to have this tech at first, so the people selling this tech will want the tech to be adequate enough for buyers to pay top dollar. And there should be improvements in the tech by the time the tech is affordable for the general public.
even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be)
Eugenics is good.
how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?
No one said anything about destorying families. While I don't think it should be common for single guys to start families by themselves, the mere option being there will improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor. When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky.
Artificial wombs is only one part. The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots. When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.
improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor
Modern sexual and romantic market has little to do with family prospects.
When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky
Men want to fuck hot women. Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men. Artificial wombs change none of that.
The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots.
Women having to compete with widespread pornography hasn't improved anything. The proliferation of porn tracks with relations between men and women becoming more fucked up, not less. Why would robots be any better?
When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete.
Again, we have history to draw on. Women eschewing motherhood and having to compete with porn haven't improved anything.
You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.
You think restricting access to childbirth based on political affiliation (IE, "I'm sorry, you're registered as a Republican, therefore you can't use the wombs) is a good thing? Or restrictions based on DIE reasons (I'm sorry, all we can offer you is black kids today, we've had too many whites so far this year) is a good thing? And that would be easy to do today. Long-term, if people can figure out some form of basic engineering, I can easily imagine the government wanting to ensure that most kids are engineered to be nice, dull and easily compliant to ensure they are good little worker drones.
When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.
You really think that's accurate? Really? In any type of basic economics, you have to offer the other party something they want. If there's realistic sex robots and artificial wombs, what else do you have to offer? Sperm? There's already sperm banks and spermjacking one simp should provide enough for a whole bunch of kids - and that's before artificial sperm comes around. Money? Uncle Sam will steal and/or print to take care of that, even if it's needed. What else do you have to offer?
Translation:. "Vile abominations against God are good if women don't like them!"
Oh, and of course it's Israel doing it. You won't ever put two and two together.
Because it is good for Jews. If tradtionalist Christians fall into the trap of thinking it is bad and ban it in their own countries, it will only be good for Jews.
Artificial wombs will lead the path forward back to patriarchal family structure by taking control away from women, who are increasingly brainwashed by Feminism.
"Buying your lab-grown baby from Pfizer is the key to restoring a patriarchal family structure."
"Trusting women to moderate their expectations is the key to a happy life, look how it worked in Japan..." awkwardly covers up suicide forest
No one here is suggesting that they be trusted at all. Hell, I openly advocate forcing most of them to confirm/behave and making public examples of the rest.
Wait, what? This probably wins the award for most insane post ever. Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't), even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be), how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?
Oh, and the primary users of these artificial wombs? Probably 40-50 year old Karens who, upon realizing their actual wombs dried up (or who got them wrecked by having a pile of abortions) go to sperm bank (or pay some 20 year old simp for some of his sperm) and then use the artificial wombs to have the kid(s) their biological clocks are demanding they have. I'm sure a whole generation of kids raised that way will only help society!
That is a fair criticism, and we will have to see what happens when artificial wombs hit the market. It will likely only be the rich to have this tech at first, so the people selling this tech will want the tech to be adequate enough for buyers to pay top dollar. And there should be improvements in the tech by the time the tech is affordable for the general public.
Eugenics is good.
No one said anything about destorying families. While I don't think it should be common for single guys to start families by themselves, the mere option being there will improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor. When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky.
Artificial wombs is only one part. The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots. When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.
Modern sexual and romantic market has little to do with family prospects.
Men want to fuck hot women. Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men. Artificial wombs change none of that.
Women having to compete with widespread pornography hasn't improved anything. The proliferation of porn tracks with relations between men and women becoming more fucked up, not less. Why would robots be any better?
Again, we have history to draw on. Women eschewing motherhood and having to compete with porn haven't improved anything.
You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.
You think restricting access to childbirth based on political affiliation (IE, "I'm sorry, you're registered as a Republican, therefore you can't use the wombs) is a good thing? Or restrictions based on DIE reasons (I'm sorry, all we can offer you is black kids today, we've had too many whites so far this year) is a good thing? And that would be easy to do today. Long-term, if people can figure out some form of basic engineering, I can easily imagine the government wanting to ensure that most kids are engineered to be nice, dull and easily compliant to ensure they are good little worker drones.
You really think that's accurate? Really? In any type of basic economics, you have to offer the other party something they want. If there's realistic sex robots and artificial wombs, what else do you have to offer? Sperm? There's already sperm banks and spermjacking one simp should provide enough for a whole bunch of kids - and that's before artificial sperm comes around. Money? Uncle Sam will steal and/or print to take care of that, even if it's needed. What else do you have to offer?
He doesn't care. He wants us all enslaved to women, it's the stormcuck way.