It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.
Imagine thinking a pajeet occupying the nominal head of the British government could possibly be an encouraging sign.
"Pajeets" can be good or bad.
He's not British.
Yes, and the people who covered up the mass rapes in Rotherham were.
Being British, or not, does not make for a good leader or a bad leader.
I think Rishi is a terrible leader, but not because he is an Indian.
It's a pretty good indication Britain is an occupied country.
Liz Truss was. Do you want her back?
It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.