This went so far that we did research as to which regiments actually came from Westphalia and which numbers they wore, because our boys came from Westphalia. We were meticulous. It didn’t necessarily make life easier for us, but it is an important reference. If you decide to do something correctly, there is only one right way,” he concluded.
They're saying the right things. Let's see what we get in reality.
The movie will probably be unmolested. Its purpose is to dissuade white males from violently overthrowing the elites. It isn't necessary, and probably undesirable, to rewrite this with black faggots, as the average viewer will naturally associate WW1 German soldiers with Nazis.
Its purpose is to dissuade white males from violently overthrowing the elites.
It exists to push an anti-war message specifically in the libtard West. The international Left sees military action by the libtard West to be anti-Left, because it was such during the Cold War.
Some libtard NPC directives take generations to update. Eventually, once the libtards fully understand that they have total control of most countries like Germany and France and the Commonwealth, they will shift gears and suddenly LOVE military aggression because they will be confident that it is a weapon which will be used for them, not against them.
Its purpose is to dissuade white males from violently overthrowing the elites.
Its purpose, as with the source material, is propagating the anti-war sentiment (pacifism). The international war in the film did end with "white males" (including mutinying soldiers and especially military sailors) overthrowing "the elites" (Kaiser himself fleeing into exile). It's just not shown, as the protagonist is killed in October 1918. And the new film, unlike the previous version, does show the politicians: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hf8EYbVxtCY
They're saying the right things. Let's see what we get in reality.
The movie will probably be unmolested. Its purpose is to dissuade white males from violently overthrowing the elites. It isn't necessary, and probably undesirable, to rewrite this with black faggots, as the average viewer will naturally associate WW1 German soldiers with Nazis.
It exists to push an anti-war message specifically in the libtard West. The international Left sees military action by the libtard West to be anti-Left, because it was such during the Cold War.
Some libtard NPC directives take generations to update. Eventually, once the libtards fully understand that they have total control of most countries like Germany and France and the Commonwealth, they will shift gears and suddenly LOVE military aggression because they will be confident that it is a weapon which will be used for them, not against them.
That theory completely ignores the fact that trotskyites have controlled the military half of the uniparty since the 50s.
Its purpose, as with the source material, is propagating the anti-war sentiment (pacifism). The international war in the film did end with "white males" (including mutinying soldiers and especially military sailors) overthrowing "the elites" (Kaiser himself fleeing into exile). It's just not shown, as the protagonist is killed in October 1918. And the new film, unlike the previous version, does show the politicians: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hf8EYbVxtCY
That's just so ironic that there's a thread right above this one that is full of retards decrying the very concept of war: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15K6XaOiyU/x/c/
Hilariously wrong, and dumb as fuck.
You're right, but at the same time these things should go without saying. All it means is, "we did historical research for a historical movie".