With all of the accusations of posts being bots, I began to think of my over posting and decided to just group together stuff I found that correlate with each other. I've mostly run into stuff about jobs and remote work, so here we go.
First up, managers believe people who work in an office work better because they are being monitored.
This follows up with the second article, people seeking jobs and jobs being offered have shown a decline in remote work. It doesn't really show much because the remote workers want a desk at random times away from their house.
However, the third article shows that the bosses and workers may just be using weaponized incompetence. This is where someone feigns incompetence so others will do their work. Bosses use that to have underlings work harder.
At the same time, AI and automation is taking away jobs quickly. If there are no workers there is no need for a boss. All we need now is a brain computer, which is my last article.
Most people are working jobs that produce zero to negative value to the company and the current work ethic is to "reward" people who finish their tasks with more fucking work at the same pay.
This idea that people are "lazy" because they no longer have to pretend to work for the last 2/3 of their day is one of the most Boomer ass takes I can imagine.
That's what happened to me. Instead of loading one truck very tightly over the course of a few hours I now have to load several trucks in the same time, which I can't do as neatly, which gets me yelled at.
Haha, you're fired. Go work for a millennial.
So you think the desire to be paid to sit around your house isn't the literal definition of laziness?
No, it's rational. If the reward structure is the same, it's foolish to expend more energy. To put it another way, unless accurate tracking and performance based incentives are in place there is no logical, self-interested reason to domore. Companies threw away goodwill first by treating workers as overly replacable.
You are overly replaceable. Your worth is directly comparable to the effort and expense it would take to get another one of you. That is the truth.
Now, as to why that's the case, your labor is devalued largely because globalism exists. Globalization of the labor market devalues everyone by having you compete against foreigners.
Does that suck? Certainly, and the neocons and liberals are traitors to the nation for implementing it. It is however still reality.
Nor does that change the fact that it is actually possible to be a valuable, irreplaceable worker. I have a good job because I'm a skilled professional. I can't be replaced easily, and I'm treated accordingly.
God, you're one of those "time to lean, time to clean" brownnosing dicksuckers, aren't you? You know, the ones that spend the last 12 years of their youth sucking up to the teacher?
If you think people aren't fucking the dog at work, you are fucking clueless. I've had actual blue collar jobs that, if I actually met my quota for the day, would result in the company literally looking for menial tasks to keep me busy for the rest of the day in a weeks time.
Not even close. Hell I was homeschooled.
Dunno why you think I'm a boomer either, I'm gen x. I find millennials and boomers to be equally worthless, just for different reasons. Boomers are consummate hypocrites who sold the country into debt slavery for vague promises of good times. While millennials are useless mental children who if they had their druthers would live like the Fat Vampire from Blade.
Gen X are just Boomers with their baseball cap backwards
That's alot of words to say you're a faggot. Go back to antiwork.
I quit having businesses with employees way before losers that bad came along. Imagine being so retarded you'd hire that guy.