Science as a whole hasn't been legitimate in probably 20 years. It's been transformed into a way for the rich and powerful (read: universities and governments) to pay men in lab coats to print propaganda.
There are aspects of it that are somewhat legitimate, certainly, but the majority is worse than useless.
Longer than that. In the 80s and 90s low-fat high-carb diets were pushed. The "food pyramid" I was taught in school was 5-12 servings of carbs per day. It was all based on bad science. It was very similar to mask "science" now where the data wouldn't match the conclusion but the conclusion would support the government position anyway.
It got worse over time. By the 80's and 90's there were still some areas that did legitimate research, but by the early 2000's it was all just trash. Just look at the different response to swine flu compared to covid. It was literally a trial run.
Women probably are more happy childless. Not because they don't have children but because they don't have to feign love towards a man they wish would die.
It's not material, it's how I genuinely perceive them.
You just have to look at all the stories of a woman completely changing after a few years of marriage to force the divorce to know that I'm right here.
They're happier without us, but they want our money.
You just have to look at all the stories of a woman completely changing after a few years of marriage to force the divorce to know that I'm right here.
These are completely unrelated. You moved from "childless women are happy" to "women don't really love men in general." If you are gonna say retarded shit, at least try to keep it on topic.
If you actually went out and interacted with women, you might be able to observe the beast in its natural habitat. Such as seeing the mental breakdown childless women have as 30 approaches consistently, and how much their words are undermined by their actions when they try to claim otherwise.
That's how almost all sciences work.
That's why every week there is a "study" about how trans kids are totes real and women are more happy childless and the bugs are healthy for you.
Science as a whole hasn't been legitimate in probably 20 years. It's been transformed into a way for the rich and powerful (read: universities and governments) to pay men in lab coats to print propaganda.
There are aspects of it that are somewhat legitimate, certainly, but the majority is worse than useless.
Longer than that. In the 80s and 90s low-fat high-carb diets were pushed. The "food pyramid" I was taught in school was 5-12 servings of carbs per day. It was all based on bad science. It was very similar to mask "science" now where the data wouldn't match the conclusion but the conclusion would support the government position anyway.
It got worse over time. By the 80's and 90's there were still some areas that did legitimate research, but by the early 2000's it was all just trash. Just look at the different response to swine flu compared to covid. It was literally a trial run.
I think that people are waking up to the fact that "science" is a total scam like "medicine" is.
Women probably are more happy childless. Not because they don't have children but because they don't have to feign love towards a man they wish would die.
Your trite is stale and boring. You need more material.
Also, its very odd to see you supporting trannies, since you seem to think you can overcome biological reality and all here.
It's not material, it's how I genuinely perceive them.
You just have to look at all the stories of a woman completely changing after a few years of marriage to force the divorce to know that I'm right here.
They're happier without us, but they want our money.
These are completely unrelated. You moved from "childless women are happy" to "women don't really love men in general." If you are gonna say retarded shit, at least try to keep it on topic.
If you actually went out and interacted with women, you might be able to observe the beast in its natural habitat. Such as seeing the mental breakdown childless women have as 30 approaches consistently, and how much their words are undermined by their actions when they try to claim otherwise.