The conservative legal group Judicial Watch had challenged the law, claiming it was illegal to use taxpayer funds to enforce a law that violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution by mandating a gender-based quota.
Judicial Watch proves their worth.
Still, shouldn't it be required that all women who got hired because of it are terminated from their position? Otherwise what stops them just constantly doing this and gaining until a court strikes it down for being obviously unconstitutional?
Makes sense. Token members of the board who serve no purpose other than to virtue signal are useless in times when you actually need a competent leader at the helm.
https://archive.ph/K1Llf
Judicial Watch proves their worth.
Still, shouldn't it be required that all women who got hired because of it are terminated from their position? Otherwise what stops them just constantly doing this and gaining until a court strikes it down for being obviously unconstitutional?
Business realizes it cannot survive on diversity alone
Well, we know Imp's happy
No, it's only slowing down. It needs to be reversed.
I should have known. You're never happy.
Fire the women appointed due to CA's law as their hiring was under duress and is invalid. No termination pay entitlement either.
Then I'd be happy.
Seems fair to me.
Makes sense. Token members of the board who serve no purpose other than to virtue signal are useless in times when you actually need a competent leader at the helm.
How about coal mining?