She said women and girls. She doesn't care about men or foetuses.
Is “materially burdening the bodily autonomy of Indiana’s women and girls” even a violation of Indiana's constitution? Perhaps the legislature WANTS to materially burden their bodily autonomy. That's their prerogative, not the judge's.
Sometimes the Imp is right. Men are just there to be used to pay for child support but if they want the kid and the mother doesn't no one bats an eye. Fuck that judge for using the age old reason to kill babies.
She said women and girls. She doesn't care about men or foetuses.
Is “materially burdening the bodily autonomy of Indiana’s women and girls” even a violation of Indiana's constitution? Perhaps the legislature WANTS to materially burden their bodily autonomy. That's their prerogative, not the judge's.
Sometimes the Imp is right. Men are just there to be used to pay for child support but if they want the kid and the mother doesn't no one bats an eye. Fuck that judge for using the age old reason to kill babies.
The Imp is set to a singular channel, and is still more right than wrong.
Fetuses can be female.
Females are well known for their unselfish camaraderie.