Great legal scholar Imp has made the definitive pronouncement on what the correct decision in this case is, and any different conclusion is a 'backstab' - provided that it comes from ACB.
Miraculously, never heard him whine about Gorsuch.
The 'deciding vote' argument is always such crap. No vote is any different from any other. It's not as if the challenge would have lost if Kav rather than ACB had voted to grant.
Furthermore, you were warned about what? That she would not always do your bidding? That is not the role of a judge. The left judges judges based on what outcome they desire. I thought you guys were supposed to be better.
I prefer ACB&Kav over Gorsuch, as they were smart enough to vote against such nonsense as covering gender identity under civil rights.
Ready for the Barrett Backstab?
Are you going to let Kavanaugh off the hook?
Actually, he did once denounce Kavanaugh... because he read on The_Donald that he was in the majority when actually in the minority.
A proper judge isn't supposed to always please you.
Great legal scholar Imp has made the definitive pronouncement on what the correct decision in this case is, and any different conclusion is a 'backstab' - provided that it comes from ACB.
Miraculously, never heard him whine about Gorsuch.
Or Roberts, who’s easily the weakest Republican appointee on the court.
The 'deciding vote' argument is always such crap. No vote is any different from any other. It's not as if the challenge would have lost if Kav rather than ACB had voted to grant.
Furthermore, you were warned about what? That she would not always do your bidding? That is not the role of a judge. The left judges judges based on what outcome they desire. I thought you guys were supposed to be better.
I prefer ACB&Kav over Gorsuch, as they were smart enough to vote against such nonsense as covering gender identity under civil rights.
I was actually expecting you to notice the Riggs thing honestly.
Someone else already said it by the time I saw this.
Darn. F1 distracted you I'm sure.