I'm all for keeping guys out of women's spaces, but good god these two are insufferable. Near the end of the interview (spoilers!) they talk about their history of activism, and I'm just thinking, "yeah, you helped create this situation. Good job, hero."
According to these two, it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights. What they fail to understand is that, no, it's about the left protecting weirdos because that's who the left likes to help. They encourage misery because they think misery is a good thing.
They'll ultimately fail because they don't even understand what they're up against.
it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights.
What do you expect, this is women's playbook for any situation that feminism can't defeat. Cry until the tradcucks save them.
I still think it's odd. There's something weird about this situation. We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they? Are they letting it happen to test what the new right's tendency to do women's bidding is?
It's less "women's playbook" and more "human nature".
The human animal is biologically hardwired to prioritize the well being of women because they are the limiting factor on reproduction. It's an evolved psychological trait.
We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they?
This may shock you, but women aren't all marching in lockstep.
For every women who is full TERF and hates this, there is another that is happily making the situation worse. For someone with a low opinion of women, you sure assign them a lot of positive traits like cohesion, solidarity and loyalty to a cause.
At the beginning of the interview, when they were just describing what happened (dude in women's locker room, insane reaction by Y staff, insane reaction by city council, insane reaction by police...) I was quite sympathetic to them.
By the end, after whining about women's rights and oppression for a good 30 minutes, I was more of the opinion: "you get what you fucking deserve."
Benjamin Boyce is a kind of 'emotional' Progressive who is a graduate of Evergreen College, just after the riots and take-over started.
One amazing feat is that his experience with early childhood education has given him a remarkable ability to explain the completely deranged psyche of the Leftists around him, and how to communicate with them. Carl Benjamin recently said it's best to treat them as someone you know has a mental illness (like schitzophernia) and not take it to seriously, whereas Benjamin tends to treat them as a misbehaving child.
Thing is, Boyce is so good at being a kind of emotional progressive that most of the Progressives find it relatively safe to talk to him, and open up about the shit that's going down in Pinko Town
Oh yeah, I'm a fan of Boyce. I check out probably 80% of the interviews he posts and most of them are pretty decent, even with the odd unbearable guest. The ones with Wokal Distance and James Lindsay are highly recommended.
I'm all for keeping guys out of women's spaces, but good god these two are insufferable. Near the end of the interview (spoilers!) they talk about their history of activism, and I'm just thinking, "yeah, you helped create this situation. Good job, hero."
According to these two, it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights. What they fail to understand is that, no, it's about the left protecting weirdos because that's who the left likes to help. They encourage misery because they think misery is a good thing.
They'll ultimately fail because they don't even understand what they're up against.
What do you expect, this is women's playbook for any situation that feminism can't defeat. Cry until the tradcucks save them.
I still think it's odd. There's something weird about this situation. We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they? Are they letting it happen to test what the new right's tendency to do women's bidding is?
It's less "women's playbook" and more "human nature".
The human animal is biologically hardwired to prioritize the well being of women because they are the limiting factor on reproduction. It's an evolved psychological trait.
This may shock you, but women aren't all marching in lockstep.
For every women who is full TERF and hates this, there is another that is happily making the situation worse. For someone with a low opinion of women, you sure assign them a lot of positive traits like cohesion, solidarity and loyalty to a cause.
MFW when trannies and feminists fight
Pretty much.
At the beginning of the interview, when they were just describing what happened (dude in women's locker room, insane reaction by Y staff, insane reaction by city council, insane reaction by police...) I was quite sympathetic to them.
By the end, after whining about women's rights and oppression for a good 30 minutes, I was more of the opinion: "you get what you fucking deserve."
Benjamin Boyce is a kind of 'emotional' Progressive who is a graduate of Evergreen College, just after the riots and take-over started.
One amazing feat is that his experience with early childhood education has given him a remarkable ability to explain the completely deranged psyche of the Leftists around him, and how to communicate with them. Carl Benjamin recently said it's best to treat them as someone you know has a mental illness (like schitzophernia) and not take it to seriously, whereas Benjamin tends to treat them as a misbehaving child.
Thing is, Boyce is so good at being a kind of emotional progressive that most of the Progressives find it relatively safe to talk to him, and open up about the shit that's going down in Pinko Town
Oh yeah, I'm a fan of Boyce. I check out probably 80% of the interviews he posts and most of them are pretty decent, even with the odd unbearable guest. The ones with Wokal Distance and James Lindsay are highly recommended.