It's a stupid idea, especially in an economic crisis. You don't pay your worst people to be even more useless.
Regardless, this is like President Trump deciding in 2024 "Actually, I like Build Back Better" and passing a bill that is identical to Biden's failed one.
He was elected specifically to not do this. He was elected on fiscal conservatism and anti-feminism, not rushing off the same cliff of trying to appease women for "muh birth rate" as his predecessor.
Megalia are still not locked up, the military service requirement is still present, and government spending has risen.
Feminism is about "liberating" women from the duties of motherhood
More generally, from biology.
I don't know how to explain that to you in a way you will understand.
You cannot argue someone out of a position by reason when he did not arrive at the position by reason.
He has some issues. Either bad experiences with the womans, paranoid personality disorder, or maybe he got trapped in an online echochamber where he heard only horrorstories about the womans (also a leading cause of female radicalization into feminism).
Paying women to make babies has literally never succeeded in raising the birth rate of any society that tries it. It only creates more fatherless children by incentivizing even more women to kick the father out of the home and replace him with the state as their breadwinner. There is nothing anti-feminist about it.
It's bad form to bring up issues you have with people on unrelated threads.
But alright, I'll bite. Just because you managed to convince yourself that Ukraine is pure and saintly, doesn't mean everyone else has to. In fact, Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out Ukraine's targeting of civilian areas in Donetsk - which they continued without a hitch as soon as Russia started the war.
Very good national socialist style policy. I'd love to see more nations adopt laws like that, as long as it doesn't subsidize foreigners over natives.
It's a stupid idea, especially in an economic crisis. You don't pay your worst people to be even more useless.
Regardless, this is like President Trump deciding in 2024 "Actually, I like Build Back Better" and passing a bill that is identical to Biden's failed one.
He was elected specifically to not do this. He was elected on fiscal conservatism and anti-feminism, not rushing off the same cliff of trying to appease women for "muh birth rate" as his predecessor.
Megalia are still not locked up, the military service requirement is still present, and government spending has risen.
He's failed on everything.
Feminism is about "liberating" women from the duties of motherhood. What he is doing is both anti-feminist and pro-family.
If there are no babies born then there isn't a country to govern. I don't know how to explain that to you in a way you will understand.
More generally, from biology.
You cannot argue someone out of a position by reason when he did not arrive at the position by reason.
He has some issues. Either bad experiences with the womans, paranoid personality disorder, or maybe he got trapped in an online echochamber where he heard only horrorstories about the womans (also a leading cause of female radicalization into feminism).
Paying women to make babies has literally never succeeded in raising the birth rate of any society that tries it. It only creates more fatherless children by incentivizing even more women to kick the father out of the home and replace him with the state as their breadwinner. There is nothing anti-feminist about it.
You just have to make it a requirement that the mother and father are together to earn the money.
Proof?
Imp heard South Korea having an "Incel Revolution" (his words) and instantly codified it as truth.
Speaking of which, so what's about you being told about "terror shelling" and it becoming your dogma just because someone told you?
It's bad form to bring up issues you have with people on unrelated threads.
But alright, I'll bite. Just because you managed to convince yourself that Ukraine is pure and saintly, doesn't mean everyone else has to. In fact, Western-backed "human rights" organizations and media have pointed out Ukraine's targeting of civilian areas in Donetsk - which they continued without a hitch as soon as Russia started the war.
Of course, I can't persuade you, because Poland.