The "if we prosecute and convict her, itll make women scared of reporting their rapes!"... we will go with their logic of "if you not doing anything wrong, why you afraid?".
They seem to not know the diff of mistaking someone as the perp and maliciously, deliberately making false accusation.
According to feminist dogma, rape benefits men in general by 'keeping women down' or something. If you believe that, and you have a potent weapon to victimize the opposite sex, obviously you're going to do everything in your power to enable false rape accusations - "to keep men down".
I can understand not prosecuting a woman when there is simply no evidence either way. In fact, that is the only reasonable course. But when it's plain that she is lying, there can be only one motivation for agitating against prosecution, and it ain't a pretty one (feminists never are).
The "if we prosecute and convict her, itll make women scared of reporting their rapes!"... we will go with their logic of "if you not doing anything wrong, why you afraid?".
They seem to not know the diff of mistaking someone as the perp and maliciously, deliberately making false accusation.
According to feminist dogma, rape benefits men in general by 'keeping women down' or something. If you believe that, and you have a potent weapon to victimize the opposite sex, obviously you're going to do everything in your power to enable false rape accusations - "to keep men down".
I can understand not prosecuting a woman when there is simply no evidence either way. In fact, that is the only reasonable course. But when it's plain that she is lying, there can be only one motivation for agitating against prosecution, and it ain't a pretty one (feminists never are).
if they have no proof, they were not raped.