A ninja moment
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
The court should've changed the fighting words doctrine to say that you can duke it out but can't kill or seriously maim each other. Or to put it into legalese, added a proportionality test to it.
I’m gonna make this very blunt: blacks can’t be trusted with such a system. If you’ve ever seen blacks fight, they rarely stop when the other party goes down. The loser usually takes multiple stomps to the head while unconscious, and that shit is often fatal. It’s not like when two dudes face up and one goes down and then it’s over. No, someone ends up in a wheel chair or dead in a large percentage of cases.
That is true for majority of cultures in the world. Only some western whites and some Asian cultures seem capable of such self restraint.
Kicking people to death when they're down and wounded happens everywhere?
I don't think this is true. Show me one example, whether it's Greece or Turkey, or Iran, Egypt, Arabs. And some Asian cultures have enough self control to not be able to stop short of murder? Which Asian culture is that kind of violent?
Muslims behead and torture and kill innocent people in the name of their honor culture and religion, but if two of them get in a fight the fight will end without a death 99.9% of the time, otherwise we'd see this behavior in the west where there are millions of them, but we only ever see one demographic acting like that.
That's "Mutual Combat", and the court didn't really have any say on it. I know Oregon allows for it. Frankly, more states should tolerate it, but a lot don't.