Motherfucker won’t step a single toe in the other rolling vax thread because he has nothing to say there. He just does these driveby “akshully” posts in the threads where he thinks he has some advantage.
A critical evaluation of the supposed evidence presented by someone certainly does not require you to post counter-evidence. An argument casting doubt on the validity of the evidence is sufficient.
No explanation for your contradiction. Opinion discarded.
Motherfucker won’t step a single toe in the other rolling vax thread because he has nothing to say there. He just does these driveby “akshully” posts in the threads where he thinks he has some advantage.
There was no contradiction, but you do have to 'discard' as you cannot refute.
Your point was "I have zero evidence. Your evidence is possibly in some situations less than 100% reliable. Therefore I'm right. Antonio, away!".
A critical evaluation of the supposed evidence presented by someone certainly does not require you to post counter-evidence. An argument casting doubt on the validity of the evidence is sufficient.