The crisis plan was to let older men die (Sorry, I meant "use palliative care") whenever possible, but in a truly dire situation, let nearly all men die to save women.
And where did you get that "crisis plan"? 1 point isn't going to make that difference.
So it's not exactly unheard of for the UK to bring their feminist psychopathy into medicine.
You have no idea what the motivation for that was though. It looks bad, but it could have a legitimate basis. It seems like they wanted to let anyone with lower chances of surviving die. Could it be that men have a lower chance of surviving?
No wait, it must all be psychopathy and 'puppeteering' and DeSantis trying to kill you for NOW bribes, eh?
And where did you get that "crisis plan"? 1 point isn't going to make that difference.
You have no idea what the motivation for that was though. It looks bad, but it could have a legitimate basis. It seems like they wanted to let anyone with lower chances of surviving die. Could it be that men have a lower chance of surviving?
No wait, it must all be psychopathy and 'puppeteering' and DeSantis trying to kill you for NOW bribes, eh?
So? What's the proof that it was based on bribes from NOW, or whatever you're claiming now, rather than for example, chances of survival?
Stop trying to make the UK government sound sensible. Obviously, if there's a high CFR, the number of women surviving is more important than men.
Is that where your brilliance comes from, like claiming that Kim Potter saw the opportunity to kill a guy?